Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Two stars-the 100-meter gold medalist and the 200-meter gold medalist-from the p

ID: 1123333 • Letter: T

Question

Two stars-the 100-meter gold medalist and the 200-meter gold medalist-from the past Olympic Games have agreed to a 150-meter duel. Before the race, each athlete decides whether to improve his performance by taking anabolic steroids. Each athlete's payoff is 60 from winning the race, 30 from tying, and 0 from losing. Furthermore, each athlete's utility from taking steroids is 18. Model this scenario as a game in which the players simultaneously decide whether to take steriods Athlete 1 Steroids No Steroids What is the Nash equilibrium? 12 Steroids ( A. The Nash equilibrium is for both athletes to use steroids O B. The Nash equilibria are for both athletes to use steroids and for both 12 athletes to not use steroids Athlete 2 ° C. The Nash equilibrium is for Athlete 1 to not use steroids and Athlete 2 42 30 to use steroids No Steroids D. The Nash equilibrium is for Athlete 1 to use steroids and Athlete 2 to not use steriods 30 E. The Nash equilibrium is for neither athlete to use steroids Is the game a prisoners' dilemma? Explain This game ( A. is a prisoners' dilemma because joint utility is maximized when neither O B. is not a prisoners' dilemma because joint utility when both athletes use ° C. is not a prisoners' dilemma because joint utility is maximized when both Athlete 1 athlete uses steroids Steroids No Steroids steroids is equal to joint utility when both athletes do not use steroids 12 athletes use steroids Steroids D. is not a prisoners' dilemma because joint utility is maximized when both 0 E. is a prisoners' dilemma because joint utility is maximized when one Suppose that one athlete's (Athlete 2's) utility of taking steroids is 36 What is the Nash equilibrium? athletes do not use steroids 24 Athlete 2 athlete uses steroids and the other athlete does not. 42 30 No Steroids 30 Click to select your answer

Explanation / Answer

Nash equilibrium is for both atheletes to use steroids. So, option ((A) is correct.

Yes, this game is a prisoner's dillemma because joint utility is maximised when one athelete uses steroids and other athelete doesn't. As this we can see from the matrix , when athelete 2 uses steroids then athelete 1 has higher pay off in not using steroids i.e 42. So, option (E) is correct.

Now, suppose one athelete's (Athelete 2's utility ) of taking steroids is -36.

No steroids

Nash equilibrium is for athelete 1 to use steroids and athelete 2 to not use steroids. So,option(c) is correct.

Yes, this game is prisoner's dilemma because joint utility is maximised when one athelte uses steroids and the other athelete doesn't . So , option (d) is correct.

ATHELETE 1 Steroids No steroids ATHELETE 2 Steroids (12,12) (42,0) No steroids (0,42) (30,30)
Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote