The Physician Payments Sunshine Act tries to create transparency on healthcare c

Question

The Physician Payments Sunshine Act tries to create transparency on healthcare companies’ interactions with physicians who ultimately prescribe drugs and medical devices to consumers. Do you believe that physicians are swayed to prescribe a product if they have received items of value from the healthcare companies that manufactured the product?

Do you think this is a good law, or do you think it’s destroying efficiencies in the healthcare industry, because it imposes greater record-keeping requirements?

Who is harmed when a doctor prescribes a product primarily based on what he had received from the healthcare manufacturer?

Explanation / Answer

The goal behind the creation of transparency between the physicians and the pharmaceutical industries is advancing medicine and patient care. It is a good law that has ensured that the interests of the individuals who need the medication are taken care of to avoid causing harm. Disclosing the payments related interactions with the healthcare professions promote the trust with patients, health professionals and government officials (Buck, 2014). Transparency in business is a good law because it creates good collaborations between the patients, doctors and other relevant medicine fields.

When the doctor prescribes medicine based on the received product, the recipient (the consumer) is harmed. The customer can be harmed both health wise and financial if there is no transparency in a situation where the doctor is influenced by the manufacturer to prescribe to the patient. The doctor should use the ethics, examine the patient and prescribe the medicine without assumptions to prevent negative consequences which can even lead to sue on carelessness.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse T
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.