sign In Does Curing Childhood Cancer Lead to a Normal Life? Does Curing Childhoo
ID: 118433 • Letter: S
Question
sign In Does Curing Childhood Cancer Lead to a Normal Life? Does Curing Childhood Cancer Lead to a Normal Life? What is the problem and what is known about it so far? s Long-term survival after childhood cancer is no longer uncommon because of major advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, curing childhood cancer comes at a price that can have serious implications throughout the remainder of the patient's life. For example, chemotherapy and radiation therapy can harm developing organs, and surgery can lead to loss of normal physical functioning. Previous studies have reported that as many as 69% of survivors of childhood cancer have physical, mental, or emotional limitations as a result of their successful cancer treatment. Why did the researchers do this particular study? To find out how often survivors of childhood cancer developed physical limitations and how often they had difficulty in participating in normal activities. in addition, the researchers wanted to know whether these limitations were affected by the type of cancer, the treatment administered, or the delayed effects of the cancer itself s 1 s of Who was studied? 11,481 people whose cancer was detected between 1970 and 1986 and who were 20 years of age or younger at the time of diagnosis. In addition, 3839 of their siblings agreed to partiapate as a comparison group A. How was the study done? All cancer survivors were interviewed and agreed to have their medical records reviewed. The researchers gathered information about the type of cancer and its treatment from medical records. Participants answered a 24-page questionnaire about the presence and timing of other medical conditions, limitations of physical performance, and whether they had any restrictions in their current participation in daily activities. The same information was collected from the siblings. What did the researchers find? Limitation of physical performance was reported by 20% of survivors compared with 12% of their siblings. Participation limitations in activities such as personal care, shopping, or housework were less common in both groups but were still almost 5 times as likely to occur in survivors as in their siblings. Six times as many survivors (compared with siblings) were unable to attend school or work. Survivors of brain and bone cancer were the mostExplanation / Answer
Does curing childhood cancer lead to a normal life?
1. what is the problem and what is known about it so far?
treatments like chemotherapy , radiotherapy and surgery are creates the difference between normal child and the cancer patient because all these treatments are damage the body organs as well as its functioning. and it also affected mentally and emotionally.
2. why did the researchers do this particular study?
researchers wanted to know that how cancer affects the child life and its activities. and how it varies with the cancer type and with their effects. its all about the cancer effects on the patient life.
3. who was studied?
in the time period of 1970-86 , 11,481 people who were 20 years or younger participated in this study plus 3839 other sibling also take a part for a comarision.
4. How was the study done?
in the study of the patiets, interview was the first step and they all agreed to reviewed of their medical history and then they give a 24 questionnaire based on their medical condition and examine there physical capabilities. and studied their problem facing in daily works. same process was repeat with the sibling.
5. what did the researchers find?
at all parameters survivors are on he higher no who faced the problem against siblings like 5 times more at the daily works, 6 time more in attending school , etc. chemotherapy and radiotherapy treated survivors having a low capabilities against the siblings because there organs are not normal as siblings.
6. what were the limitation of the study?
therapeutic technique has been improved in this timeperiod and this survey was a voluntary so we missed those survivors who got good result and who are in a good condition as siblings.
7. what are the implication of the study?
treatment is not just a challenge for themselves they faced its repercussion after the treatment also and we need a rehabiliate service to overcome these adverse effect.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.