In a 500-750-word essay, select two assessment tools mental health professionals

Question

In a 500-750-word essay, select two assessment tools mental health professionals may use to determine wellness and emotional well-being. Be sure to address the following in your essay: How does wellness and emotional well-being impact the body, mind, and spirit of an individual? What are the basic features of each assessment tool you are analyzing? What are the similarities and differences between these assessments? In other words, what are their benefits and limitations? How is information from these assessments used to inform the treatment process? What might cause a mental health professional to select one over the other in different contexts?

Explanation / Answer

Curiosity in the education of psychological well-being and well-being has augmented meaningfully in recent periods. A diversity of conceptualizations of mental health have been future counting hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, quality-of-life, and wellness methods. Though tools for gaging concepts related with apiece of these methods have been industrialized, there has remained no complete appraisal of well-being events. The current literature appraisal was assumed to recognize self-report gadgets measuring well-being or carefully connected concepts and disapprovingly appraise them with respect to their theoretical foundation and psychometric belongings. Through a literature exploration, it is identified that 42 tools that diverse knowingly in distance, psychometric assets, and their conceptualization and operationalization of well-being.

The hedonic methods to conceptualizing well-being emphasize on desire and contentment. The most protuberant hedonic prototypical is known as personal well-being, a three-way typical containing of consummation with lifetime, the nonappearance of negative touch, and the attendance of optimistic touch. Advocates of this viewpoint incline to conceptualize well-being in footings of all three of these hypotheses, although many academics emphasize on life gratification alone when evaluating well-being from this standpoint. The eudaimonic methods to conceptualizing well-being suggest that mental health is understood by satisfying one’s budding, operative at an optimum level, or realizing one’s true nature. In change to the emphasis on affect and life gratification in the hedonic representations, eudaimonic representations incline to emphasis on a larger amount of life areas, though they vary meaningfully concerning the fundamental rudiments that control well-being. For instance, one of the more protuberant eudaimonic representations is the psychosomatic well-being prototypical, which proposes that well-being contains of six rudiments: self-acceptance, confident families with others, independence, ecological mastery, drive in life, and individual growth. The eudaimonic prototypical planned by Ryan and Deci, however, advises that well-being is create in the contentment of three rudimentary mental needs: independence, ability, and understanding. Obviously these two representations overlay, but they also demonstrate the disparity originated inside the eudaimonic methods to sympathetic well-being.

A third group of methods to conceptualizing well-being emphases on excellence of life. The word QoL is frequently used interchangeably with happiness in the works. For instance, the writers who industrialized the Excellence of Life List use the footings excellence of lifetime, personal well-being, and life gratification interchangeably. Though, those learning QoL usually abstract well-being additional approximately than also the hedonic or eudaimonic replicas and comprise bodily, mental, and communal features of operative. This method has been prejudiced by a diversity of corrections counting drug, sociology, and thinking, and is repeatedly working in medical settings. In the part of oncology, for instance, the dimension of QoL for patients with cancer has convert extremely advanced. The WHO describes QoL as an extensive variety notion exaggerated in a multifaceted method by the persons’ physical well-being, emotional state, level of individuality, social dealings and their connection to striking topographies of their setting.

The dependability constants stated for the gadgets varied extensively, and were often at heights too low for many investigation and clinical drives dependability constants of 0.70 or better are usually careful passable for investigation drives, while constants of 0.90 or superior are carefully passable for numerous scientific drives.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.