Out in the street. Chris and Pat are playing hockey. Chris swings the hockey sti
ID: 1392715 • Letter: O
Question
Explanation / Answer
I. Yes the puck exert a force on the hockey stick and the direction of that force is just opposite to that of the box i.e. to left. The puck exert same amount of force on the stick. Here we have two forces. Suppose the stick exert force F on the puck. This force is much greater than the friction and the puck start to accelerate and just before that the puck also exert force F on the stick. But as the mass of the stick is much larger than that of the puck we hardly see a movement of the stick.
II. From Newton's third law we can easily say, in both the cases, the magnitude of the force that Jan exerts on the fridge is equal to the magnitude of the force exerted on Jan by the fridge. But what is the difference between these two cases?
Case 1 : To move the fridge Jan must have to exert force to overcome the frictional force for the fridge. Suppose the frictional force is Ffriction . In this case Jan is exerting a force F<Ffriction . So the fridge is not moving but it exert same amount of force F on Jan.
Case 2 : Here Jan exert a force F>Ffriction and the fridge start to move in a constant speed. But again the fridge exert same amount of force F on Jan.
III. No totally disagree. Actually, Sue's weight is acting on the stool downwards. And from Newton's third law the stool exert same amount of reaction force on Sue upwards. This reaction force nullyfies Sue's weight and that is why Sue is not falling. Suppose there is no stool, then no reaction force to balance Sue's weight and Sue will fall.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.