I need help We have same report can some one make a lettle change in the this Co

Question

I need help

We have same report can some one make a lettle change in the this Conclusion

After we had designed the amplifier, we expected significant errors of component values, then doing calculated versus the values of elements we had on hand. But when comparing the results between P-Spice and the real circuit, there was not a huge error between the two (1-2% error). What we understand now is that testing the circuit on P-Spice putting together the circuit is important as P-Spice will show us what to expect.

Explanation / Answer

CONCLUSION

In this report, we have designed an amplifier and obtained results are tabulated in the report. We expected noticeable error owing to the non ideal behavior of many practical devices. This was proved conclusively using the measured values versus original values graph we plotted in this report. However we also noticed that results from p-spice simulation are a good approximation to the real circuit. Error range from 1 to 2 % was noticed. This is important in big industries which do not have the time or resource to fabricate the circuit each time a new design is tested. They would prefer to simulated the circuit in P-Spice and then after all bugs are sorted out approve the design for final fabrication and testing. Therefore we have come to the conclusion that simulation of a circuit in p-spice is a good tool to optimize the designed circuit on paper.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.