Identify a real world situation where the collection and analysis of personal he

Question

Identify a real world situation where the collection and analysis of personal health-related data was compromised resulting in potential or real harm to patients, clients, or residents. Research the incident and examine it to determine what occurred, what caused it, and the resulting potential risk and/or actual harm that occurred. Write a concise academic paper discussing your findings being sure to: •Summarize the incident, cause, risk and/or harm, and to whom •Discuss the advantages (opportunities) and disadvantages (risk) of collecting and storing the personal and identifiable data involved •Utilize standard vocabulary and identify classification systems as it relates to the case study •Identify and analyze the ethical and management challenges as a result of the compromised personal and identifiable data. •Propose solutions and safeguards (e.g. practice, policy, and regulatory recommendations) that could prevent similar situations in the future.

Explanation / Answer

Every person has the right to return from work safely. This is the humanitarian and social aspect of improvements in workplace prevention and protection. Other challenges to consider: with increasing global competition, productive and successful economies become more and more essential for the well-being of people. In order to meet substantial challenges, all political and economic leaders agrees that there is an enormous potential benefit to be gained from improved safety and health in the workplace and a reduction in occupational accidents and diseases.

One of the basic aims of data analysis is to identify the main problems in the field of road safety. The efficiency of accident prevention depends significantly on the reliability of the collected and estimated data and the appropriateness of the used methods.

Different risk categories are used in the field of road safety analysis, for example: accident risk, injury risk, fatality risk, etc.

Theoretical definition of risk The risk (or probability) of an accident can be calculated in the following way:

accident risk = numberof accidents/ units of exposure

Exposure denotes the number of trials in which one of the possible outcomes is an accident.

As accident involvement is an event occurring in time and space, the general epidemiological concept of disease incidence (incidence = number of new cases of a disease within a specified period of time) applies to studies on accident involvement risk. In the report, an overview of statistical methods is presented which prove to be especially suitable for investigations on the risk of accident involvement, accident causation and accidental injury. Different descriptive measures of chance of accident involvement and accidental injury are considered in the report:

• Risk, relative risk and attributable risk • Odds and odds ratio • Incidence rate and incidence rate ratio (relative rate) o per-capita accident involvement rate o per-vehicle accident involvement rate • Incidence density and incidence density ratio (relative density) o trip distance-related accident involvement density o trip time-related accident involvement density.

Advantages: • The best indicator from the theoretical point of view. Second advantage is it is the best indicator of the fatality risk. Both the nominator and the denominator are reliable

Disadvantages: • In most countries only the estimated number of vehicle kilometres is available, if any • the methods of estimation are different in the individual countries. Differences and problems in the registration of the vehicles Different composition of the vehicle fleet can cause distortion in the estimation and comparison of the fatality rate. This indicator can be used mainly for the comparison of the consequences of road accidents and other causes of deaths (illnesses, epidemics, etc.). It does not depend significantly on the level of motorization, therefore can have a low value not only in countries with good road safety records, but with low motorization level, as well.

Prevention is the key. Effective prevention driven by all stakeholders reduces occupational accidents and diseases, improves product quality and the economic performance of enterprises and national economies. Effective prevention makes companies more successful and saves lives. This is why, all over the world, prevention is becoming more of a focus for governments, political decision makers, economic leaders and managers, social partners and all stakeholders of society. A crucial and fundamental part of every prevention strategy is to have a clear knowledge of the number of accidents and diseases, their severity, the causes, and the workplaces and industries where they occur. This means that every country needs a well-functioning and effective system for reporting accidents and diseases and for analyzing the resulting database. Experience shows that it is not a simple project to set up an effective reporting system, to design the right database, to obtain the required additional data and to draw useful conclusions for national, industry-specific or enterprise-specific prevention strategies and action plans. Some countries have accumulated valuable experience of reporting systems based on their practices over decades. These experiences could serve as models of good practice and have the potential to benefit other countries.

The main aim of this research is to describe the most fundamental elements needed to establish an efficient, functional national reporting system for occupational accidents and diseases and to offer a step-by-step guide to setting up new national systems and improving existing ones. Some essential recommendations will be given as ‘Top tips’, which can then be used for orientation or as a checklist. Some best practice examples will also be given in order to demonstrate the practical use of the recommendations. The information in this report is useful for governments and political decision-makers, workers and their representatives, company managers, labour inspectors, social security and insurance scheme providers, occupational safety and health practitioners and other stakeholders interested in safety and health at work.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.