You are a prosecutor who thinks it is possible that Louisa, in her role as CEO o
ID: 2331834 • Letter: Y
Question
You are a prosecutor who thinks it is possible that Louisa, in her role as CEO of a brokerage firm, has stolen money from her customers, many of whom are not well off.If you charge her and her company with RICO violations, you know that she is likely to plea bargain because otherwise her assets and those of the company may be frozen by the court. As part of the plea bargain, you might be able to get her to disclose evidence about other people who might have taken part in this criminal activity. But you do not have any hard evidence at this point.
Would such an indictment be ethical? Do the ends justify the means? If your answer above is no, what would you want to have before indicting Louisa? Is it worth it to harm Louisa for the chance of protecting the innocent investors? You are a prosecutor who thinks it is possible that Louisa, in her role as CEO of a brokerage firm, has stolen money from her customers, many of whom are not well off.
If you charge her and her company with RICO violations, you know that she is likely to plea bargain because otherwise her assets and those of the company may be frozen by the court. As part of the plea bargain, you might be able to get her to disclose evidence about other people who might have taken part in this criminal activity. But you do not have any hard evidence at this point.
Would such an indictment be ethical? Do the ends justify the means? If your answer above is no, what would you want to have before indicting Louisa? Is it worth it to harm Louisa for the chance of protecting the innocent investors? You are a prosecutor who thinks it is possible that Louisa, in her role as CEO of a brokerage firm, has stolen money from her customers, many of whom are not well off.
If you charge her and her company with RICO violations, you know that she is likely to plea bargain because otherwise her assets and those of the company may be frozen by the court. As part of the plea bargain, you might be able to get her to disclose evidence about other people who might have taken part in this criminal activity. But you do not have any hard evidence at this point.
Would such an indictment be ethical? Do the ends justify the means? If your answer above is no, what would you want to have before indicting Louisa? Is it worth it to harm Louisa for the chance of protecting the innocent investors?
Explanation / Answer
If Louisa and her company are charged with RICO violations, Racketeer influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of actions for Acts performed as part of the ongoing criminal organization.
However, Louisa is likely to plea bargain because if she is charges with the RICO violations her assets and those ofthe company might get frozen by the court. As part of the plea bargain, we can be able to get her to disclose evidence about the other people who might have taken part in this criminal activity.
But , we do not have any hard evidence then we can not charge her and her company with RICO violations and even we can't ask her to plea bargain. As evidence is necessary against the defendent for any criminal allegations.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.