U 1,2, 3 valuating Profit and Investment Center Performance P3. Th acquisition a
ID: 2404599 • Letter: U
Question
U 1,2, 3 valuating Profit and Investment Center Performance P3. Th acquisition and disposal decisions for the firm. As managing partner, partners in charge of the firm's three branch offices. Those part RATIO managing partner of the law firm Sewell, Bagan, and Clark, LLP, makes asset she supervises the ners have the authority ployce compensation decisions. The partners compensation depends on the SPREADSHEET tween actual and to make e income: $1.900u profitability of their branch office. Vanessa Smith manages the City Branch, ween income: $1,800U ving master budget and actual results for the year ended December 31. Master Budget Actual Results Billed hours Revenue Controllable variable costs 5,000 4,900 250,000 254,800 Direct labor Variable overhead 120,000) (90,000) 90,000 137.200) (34,300) 83,300 Contribution margin Controllable fixed costs: Rent Other administrative expenses (30,000) (45,000) 15,000 (30,000) (42,000) $ 11,300 Branch operating income REQUIRED 1. Assume that the City Branch is a profit center. Prepare a performance report that includes a flexible budget. Determine the variances between actual results, the flex ible budget, and the master budget. 2. ACCOUNTING CONNECTIONEvaluate Vanessa Smith's performance as manager of the City Branch. 3. Assume that the branch managers are assigned responsibility for capital expenditures and that the branches are thus investment centers. City Branch is expected to gener- ate a desired ROI of at least 30 percent on average invested assets of $40,000. a. Compute the branch's return on investment and residual income. (Round per- centages to two decimal places.) b. ACCOUNTING CONNECTIONUsing the ROI and residual income, evaluate Vanessa Smith's performance as branch manager.Explanation / Answer
2. Vanesa Smith's Billed hours remain 100 hours less than budgeted but per hour revenue increased but rate for director labour hour increased by 16.67%,, hence reduction in contribution margin and Branch Operaring Oncome
Sewell, Bagan and Clark, LLP City Branch Performance Report For the Year Ended December 31 Partner Incharge: Vanesa Smith Actual Results Variance Flexible Budget Variance Master Budget Billed Hours 4,900 - 4,900 5,000 Revenue 254,800 9,800 F 245,000 (5,000) U 250,000 Controllable variable costs Direct Labour (137,200) (19,600) U (117,600) 2,400 F (120,000) Variable Overhead (34,300) 4,900 F (39,200) 800 F (40,000) Contribution Margin 83,300 (4,900) U 88,200 (1,800) F 90,000 Controllable Fixed Costs Rent (30,000) - (30,000) - (30,000) Other administrative expenses (42,000) 3,000 F (45,000) - (45,000) Branch Operating Income 11,300 (1,900) U 13,200 (1,800) U 15,0002. Vanesa Smith's Billed hours remain 100 hours less than budgeted but per hour revenue increased but rate for director labour hour increased by 16.67%,, hence reduction in contribution margin and Branch Operaring Oncome
3 Actual Flexible Master ROI = 11,300 / 40,000 13,200 / 40,000 15,000 / 40,000 = 28.25% 33.00% 37.50% Residual Income = 11,300 - 12,000 13,200 - 12,000 15,000 - 12,000 = (700) 1,200 3,000Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.