Which of the following actions could increase the balance in the paid-in capital

Question

Which of the following actions could increase the balance in the paid-in capital in excess of par-common account? Which of the following actions could increase the balance in the paid-in capital in excess of par-common account? d. The woman's negligent conduct in accidentally pushing the nine riginal wrongdoer superseding cause and as a result would completely cut off the labity employee and also the store. pushing the man into the spill would be of the original wrongdoer, the 10. Briney inherited her parents' farm. No one has occupied the farm house since her parents 10 years ago. ng parents t those 10 years and very events. Briney had "No Trespassing signs on the land -one was 35 feet from the house. Briney set trap in the main bedroom of the house. She took her 20 gauge shot gun (which she knew was very which she got at a discount for being a member of the NRA (National Rifle Association) and secure bed frame in the main bedroom where apparently the trespassers would always go to steal items room. The barrel of the gun was pointed at the bedroom's door and rigged with wire from gun's trigger so it would fire when the door was opened. Briney later admitted she set the trap becau mad and tired of being tormented' by the trespassing. She also admits she had no intention of she just wanted to scare them. No warning of the trap was posted. On the night in question, trespass entered the farm house. As he started to open the door to the main bedroom, the shotgun went the lower abdomen causing serious personal injury. Presume the duty of care owed to a trespasser upon real property or within your that while there is no duty of care to an adult trespasser, it is "a shot gun powerful and it to an iron in that stored knob to the she was Abe, off striking him in law where this occurred states that there is home. However, presume the law also states or possessor of the land to the trespasser by setting a trap. Which is the most ikely result of the lawsuit fled by Abe against Briney a. Abe will lose his lawsuit against Briney because the trespasser had no right to be on or in the property should lose his lawsuit because there is a need to deter people from trespassing onto other c. Briney will be held liable for Abe's injuries since while the law of the State states that no duty of care is and in addition he was there to commit a crime of burglary b. Abe people's property and it will be a lesson to all others who may think about belng a trespasser owed to an adult trespasser, there is also the requirement that an owner or possessor of land cannot d. Abe should lose his lawsuit because of the reasons stated in "a and "b above and be thankful he trailer, he was struck in the back from behind by a forklift. John did not see the forklift coming towards him and commit an intentional tort against the trespasser, like setting a trap to harm the trespasser was not killed. 11. John parked his trailer truck in the loading area at a warehouse. While John was opening the back had no idea who was driving it. In addition, there were no witnesses. This would be an example of following legal principles a. Negligence per se b. John would have to still prove the four essential elements of negligence law in order to prevail in a lawsuit against the owners of the warehouse. c. Res lpsa Loquitur (the thing speaks for itself). Forklifts do not move on their own and hit people in the d. Intervening cause or superseding cause. back if there was no negligence (carelessness) on the part of someone. 12. Amy and Frances were standing on opposite sides of a swinging door. Both try to go through the swinging door her injuries. Frances and Amy live in a State that has the partial comparative negligence doctrine. Therefore, the a. Army will not be able to recover for her injuries since she was close to 50% responsible for her injuries. at the same time, but Frances uses a little more force and knocks Amy backwards on her back and she hits her head on the floor recen ing a concussion and a factured neck. The ury determines that Amy is 49% at fault for result will be: b. Army will be allowed to recover money, but only 49% of the award because of the fact that her State has partial comparative negligence. Amy will be allowed to recover money because partial comparative negligence means that assessment (tag) against a plaintiff must be below 50% in order for the plaintiff to recover, amount awarded to Amy by the jury will be reduced by the amount of the percentagea c.

Explanation / Answer

7. A state applying contributory negligence will allow plantiff to recover if her fault is minor 8. Modified Partial Comparitive negligence only 9. The Store and Store employee will always be responsible for the dangerous condition because a caution sign was not placed at the Spill

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse W
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.