In Texas, which of the following is true with regard to employment discriminatio
ID: 2582307 • Letter: I
Question
In Texas, which of the following is true with regard to employment discrimination cases?
a. Employment discrimination cases are often appropriate for motion for summary judgment because they involve questions of case law as to intent and motive which are questions for the jury to decide.
b. Employment discrimination cases are often appropriate for motion for summary judgment because they involve questions of law as to intent and motive which are questions for the judge to decide.
c. None of the other choices are correct.
d. Employment discrimination cases are rarely appropriate for motion for summary judgment because they involve questions of law as to intent and motive which are questions for the jury to decide.
e. Employment discrimination cases are rarely appropriate for motion for summary judgment because they involve questions of fact as to intent and motive which are questions for the jury to decide.
Explanation / Answer
a. Employment discrimination cases are often appropriate for motion for summary judgment because they involve questions of case law as to intent and motive which are questions for the jury to decide.
This must be the correct answer because in todays scenarios, Judges are skeptical of the fact that with continous on going training by government, code of conduct any employer would actually break the law intentionally and the case of discremenation is more based on circumstances of the case, thus I would go with Option A where Jury decides the case on the merit of the circumstances.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.