Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for pollution control e
ID: 2729799 • Letter: T
Question
Two mutually exclusive alternatives are being considered for pollution control equipment. The economic data is given below:
A B
Initial cost $20,000 $38,000
Annual expenses $5,500 $5,000
Useful life 5 years 9 years
Salvage value at the end $1,000 $3,000
Of useful life
The study period is 9 years. If alternative A is selected, a portable system would be leased for the last 4 years at a cost of $10,000 per year including all expenses. If the MARR is 15% per year, which alternative should be selected?
Explanation / Answer
EUAC A B Cash Flow -20000 0.2983 (A/P, 15%, 5) -5966.31 -38000 0.2096 (A/P, 15%, 9) -7963.813 1000 0.1483 (A/F, 15%, 5) 148.3156 3000 0.0596 (A/F, 15%, 9) 178.72205 -5500 1 -5500 -5000 1 -5000 -14194.29 0.2983 (A/P, 15%, 5) -4234.38 (A/P, 15%, 9) -15552.4 -12785.09 PVF 6 10000 0.432327596 4323.276 7 10000 0.37593704 3759.37 8 10000 0.326901774 3269.018 9 10000 0.284262412 2842.624 Present Value 14194.29 Conclusion : Alternative B should be chosen as it has lower EUAC
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.