GIVEN online.valenciacollege.edu This is a graded discussion: 5 points possible

Question

GIVEN online.valenciacollege.edu This is a graded discussion: 5 points possible due Jun 17 To cut or not to cut, that is the question! Conservationists argue that the watershed protection, and other ecological functions (provisioning, regulating, etc) of forests are more economically valuable than the timber that resides on them. Timber companies argue that continued production of timber supports stable jobs and local economies. Answer the following questions: 1. What are all the things that I need to successfully accomplish this task? 2. If I were a judge attempting to decide which group was right, what evidence would I need on both sides? 3. How will I gather this evidence? 4. What is the most challenging thing for me about this task? 5. To what extent did I use the resources available to me? Search entries or author Unread s Reply reply. Replies are only visible to those who have posted at least one

Explanation / Answer

1. To successfully accomolacc the task whether cut to or not to , first observe and consider both the arguments of both the parties. Check positive and negative points of the issue . Consider advantages and disadvantages. Reserach on every point whether to cut or not and then decide what to do further. After observing all the points , pen down the points and decide. Think about future generation and then decide

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse G
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.