Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

3.28. A semiconductor manufacturer has developed three different methods for red

ID: 2921341 • Letter: 3

Question

3.28. A semiconductor manufacturer has developed three different methods for reducing particle counts on wafers. All three methods are tested on six different wafers and the after treatment particle count obtained. The data are shown below: Method Count 4 1 11 24 30 35 43 27 120 97 6880 10 31 62 4 53 21 2 (a) Do all methods have the same effect on mean particle count? (b) Plot the residuals versus the predicted response. Construct a normal probability plot of the residuals. re there potential concerns about the validity of the e vaidity of the assumptions? ased on your answer to part (b) conduct another analysis of the particle count data and draw appropri- ate conclusions.

Explanation / Answer

Answer:

a).

MINITAB used

One-way ANOVA: Method1, Method2, Method3

Method

Null hypothesis

All means are equal

Alternative hypothesis

Not all means are equal

Significance level

= 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information

Factor

Levels

Values

Factor

3

Method1, Method2, Method3

Analysis of Variance

Source

DF

Adj SS

Adj MS

F-Value

P-Value

Factor

2

11308

5654.1

12.36

0.001

Error

15

6861

457.4

Total

17

18169

Model Summary

S

R-sq

R-sq(adj)

R-sq(pred)

21.3867

62.24%

57.20%

45.62%

Means

Factor

N

Mean

StDev

95% CI

Method1

6

13.00

11.19

(-5.61, 31.61)

Method2

6

39.00

13.18

(20.39, 57.61)

Method3

6

74.2

32.8

(55.6, 92.8)

Pooled StDev = 21.3867

Calculated F=12.36, P=0.001 which is < 0.05 level. Ho is rejected. We conclude that the three methods are not equal.

b).

The plots shows that assumptions for ANOVA is not met.

c).

Nonparametric method, Kruskal-Wallis Test used.

Kruskal-Wallis Test: data versus method

Descriptive Statistics

method

N

Median

Mean Rank

Z-Value

Method1

6

10.5

4.0

-3.09

Method2

6

37.5

10.2

0.37

Method3

6

74.0

14.3

2.72

Overall

18

9.5

Test

Null hypothesis

H: All medians are equal

Alternative hypothesis

H: At least one median is different

DF

H-Value

P-Value

2

11.38

0.003

Calculated H=11.38, P=0.003 which is < 0.05 level. Ho is rejected. We conclude that the three methods are not equal.

Null hypothesis

All means are equal

Alternative hypothesis

Not all means are equal

Significance level

= 0.05

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote