Please review the attached climate articles and then answer the following questi

Question

Please review the attached climate articles and then answer the following questions for next class 5/30:

1. What "surprising" discoveries have been made in the Arctic and Antarctic regions and why is this significant?

2. Do these excavations testify to a constant climate on Earth similar to today or something else?

3. Does the evidence point to a slow and gradual change or a sudden and dramatic event?

--give supporting info to back up these assessments.

See attached articles (3 of them on one attached Word document). You will need to be thoroughly familiar with the information found therein and how it ties in to the bigger picture and what it helps to shed light on during the final exam.

In particular as you review them please remember the relevant points mentioned and pondered in class:

Despite the seeming certainty of the dates suggested for the time periods under critique and investigation the reality is those numbers are probably some of the most inaccurate information presented there, as we briefly discussed and as can be seen by a cursory comparison between each of the three articles. -- Remember, think "Butterfly Effect" and the relevant points revealed there:

-A tiny change in initial conditions or an extra variable at some point down the line will lead to a huge effect and a drastic change of outcome (think weather forecasting and the impossibility of good predictions beyond the short-term window, and even that is a stretch sometimes).

-Furthermore, all of the data must be known at each point along the way for an accurate and linear extrapolation. Any unknown or unaccounted for piece of information during data computation will lead to a loss of extrapolation potential and undermine the final result.

How do these findings challenge the notions and assumed norms of the current earth climate system? Are there more answers given or more questions raised with the availability of these discoveries? Have these discoveries been made widely known to the "mainstream"? Why or why not and again why does it matter?

Do these findings point to a gradual and predictable change on earth or a sudden and dramatic one? What is the evidence? Was this change local, regional or global? Why does it matter?

Explanation / Answer

i want to make your attentions in this way that here you have mentioned to review the article but there is no article on which we need to review. here are some questions based on the article. as you just putted one paragraph and from that i am solving this.

1) the surprising discoveries which were made in artic and antarctica are as follows-

=> dinosures once lived in the antarctica. it was estimated by the scientist that many years ago the dinosures were lived on the antartica. many evidence are found there.

=> a meteroits found in the antarctica which is possible evidence of the ancient life on mars.

=>it is the best spot for the listening of the eartquack.

=>many active sea volcano beneath the sea coast of antarctica.

=>there are many life exist under 1000ft depth.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

no there is no gradual change take place by this point on this earth. as they are happened in past and have the recurrance in them which with thay can bring changes gradually and not suddenly.

the evidence are the discoveries in that perticular region and the climatic pattern relative to that area. if this change occurs then it will be a global one.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse P
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.