Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Consider the following data, which lists the winning times for the women\'s 400-

ID: 3021963 • Letter: C

Question

Consider the following data, which lists the winning times for the women's 400-meter

freestyle swim from 1932 through 1996:

Year

Winner, Country. . . . . . . . .

. . . Time

1932

Helene Madison, USA

5:28.5

1936

Rie Mastenbroek, HOL

5:26.4

1948

Ann Curtis, USA

5:17.8

1952

Valeria Gyenge, HUN

5:12.1

1956

Lorraine Crapp, AUS

4:54.6

1960

Chris von Saltza, USA

4:50.6

1964

Ginny Duenkel, USA

4:43.3

1968

Debbie Meyer, USA

4:31.8

1972

Shane Gould, AUS

4:19.4

1976

Petra Thumer, E. Ger

4:09.9

1980

Ines Diers, E. Ger

4:08.8

1984

Tiffany Cohen, USA

4:07.1

1988

Janet Evans, USA

4:03.9

1992

Dagmar Hase, GER

4:07.2

1996

Michelle Smith, IRE

4:07.3


Assuming the data are linearly related, and using a least-squares linear regression, what would be the prediction for the winning time had there been an Olympics in 1970?


4:37.8

4:33.2

4:40.8

4:35.6

4:29.8

Year

Winner, Country. . . . . . . . .

. . . Time

1932

Helene Madison, USA

5:28.5

1936

Rie Mastenbroek, HOL

5:26.4

1948

Ann Curtis, USA

5:17.8

1952

Valeria Gyenge, HUN

5:12.1

1956

Lorraine Crapp, AUS

4:54.6

1960

Chris von Saltza, USA

4:50.6

1964

Ginny Duenkel, USA

4:43.3

1968

Debbie Meyer, USA

4:31.8

1972

Shane Gould, AUS

4:19.4

1976

Petra Thumer, E. Ger

4:09.9

1980

Ines Diers, E. Ger

4:08.8

1984

Tiffany Cohen, USA

4:07.1

1988

Janet Evans, USA

4:03.9

1992

Dagmar Hase, GER

4:07.2

1996

Michelle Smith, IRE

4:07.3

Explanation / Answer

y= 0.03871 - 0.0000814*x where x = 1970

So, at x = 1970 y= 4:33.2

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote