University of Texas at El Paso IE 3352 Design of Experiments 2. Four different d
ID: 3052155 • Letter: U
Question
University of Texas at El Paso IE 3352 Design of Experiments 2. Four different designs for a digital computer circuit are being studied in order to compare the amount of noise present. The following data have been obtained: Circuit Design Noise Observed 2 80 3 47 4 1 17 20 19 18 18 50 40 97 73 25 83 61 26 56 66 35 75 a. Is the amount of noise present the same for all four designs? Use 0.05. i. State the hypotheses, ii. What is the p-value? ili. What is the decision? iv. Make conclusions. b. Analyze the residuals from this experiment. Are the basic analysis of variance assumptions satisfied? i. State the hypotheses i. What is the p-value? ii. What is the decision? iv. Make conclusions. c. Based on your answer on part (b) conduct another analysis of the observed noise data with a transformation and draw the appropriate conclusions. d. Use Tukey's method to compare all pair of Noise transformation means. What conclusions can you draw e. Use Kruskal Wallis test to analyze the observed noise and draw conclusions. i. State the hypotheses, ii. What is the test statistic? ii. What is the p-value? iv. What is the decision? v. Make conclusions.Explanation / Answer
Question 2.a.
Part i
For the given test, the null and alternative hypotheses are given as below:
Null hypothesis: H0: The average amounts of noise present in four circuit designs are same.
Alternative hypothesis: Ha: The average amounts of noise present in four circuit designs are not same.
Or
Alternative hypothesis: Ha: At least two average amounts of noise present in four circuit designs are not same.
In symbolic form, it is given as below:
H0: µ1 = µ2 = µ3 = µ4 versus Ha: at least two µ’s are not same.
Part ii
Here, we have to find p-value for the given test. We have to use one way analysis of variance or ANOVA test for checking the above null hypothesis. The ANOVA table for this test by using excel is given as below:
ANOVA: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups
Count
Sum
Average
Variance
Design 1
5
92
18.4
1.3
Design 2
5
330
66
131.5
Design 3
5
173
34.6
87.3
Design 4
5
379
75.8
238.7
ANOVA
Source of Variation
SS
df
MS
F
P-value
F crit
Between Groups
10753
3
3584.333
31.24964
6.36E-07
3.238872
Within Groups
1835.2
16
114.7
Total
12588.2
19
From above ANOVA table, the p-value for this test is given as 6.36E-07 or 0.000000636.
Part iii
We reject the null hypothesis if the p-value is less than the given level of significance. Here, we are given a level of significance = = 0.05
P-value = 0.000000636
= 0.05
P-value < = 0.05
So, we reject the null hypothesis that the average amounts of noise present in four circuit designs are same.
Part iv
For the above test, we reject the null hypothesis that the average amounts of noise present in four circuit designs are same. This means, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the average amounts of noise present in four circuit designs are not same.
ANOVA: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups
Count
Sum
Average
Variance
Design 1
5
92
18.4
1.3
Design 2
5
330
66
131.5
Design 3
5
173
34.6
87.3
Design 4
5
379
75.8
238.7
ANOVA
Source of Variation
SS
df
MS
F
P-value
F crit
Between Groups
10753
3
3584.333
31.24964
6.36E-07
3.238872
Within Groups
1835.2
16
114.7
Total
12588.2
19
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.