The results of a two-way ANOVA using the accompanying data and hypothesis tests
ID: 3072905 • Letter: T
Question
The results of a two-way ANOVA using the accompanying data and hypothesis tests for interaction between Factor A and Factor B and for each factor are provided below. Using these data and results, determine which means are different using = 0.01when warranted.
Factor A
FactorB
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 1
66
88
1010
77
1212
3232
1010
1919
3030
Level 2
2828
3030
3030
1111
2020
3838
1616
2020
3939
Level 3
3535
4040
4242
3131
2929
4141
2121
4040
3232
Are the means for Factor A, Level 1 and Factor A, Level 2 significantly different?
A.Yes
B. No
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Are the means for Factor A, Level 1 and Factor A, Level 3 significantly different?
A.Yes
B. No
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Are the means for Factor A, Level 2 and Factor A, Level 3 significantly different?
A.Yes
B.No
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Are the means for Factor B, Level 1 and Factor B, Level 2 significantly different?
A.Yes
B.No
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Are the means for Factor B, Level 1 and Factor B, Level 3 significantly different?
A.No
B.Yes
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Are the means for Factor B, Level 2 and Factor B, Level 3 significantly different?
A.No
B.Yes
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Factor A
FactorB
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 1
66
88
1010
77
1212
3232
1010
1919
3030
Level 2
2828
3030
3030
1111
2020
3838
1616
2020
3939
Level 3
3535
4040
4242
3131
2929
4141
2121
4040
3232
Explanation / Answer
Answer:
The results of a two-way ANOVA using the accompanying data and hypothesis tests for interaction between Factor A and Factor B and for each factor are provided below. Using these data and results, determine which means are different using = 0.01when warranted.
MINITAB used.
General Linear Model: Data versus A, B
Method
Factor coding
(-1, 0, +1)
Factor Information
Factor
Type
Levels
Values
A
Fixed
3
A1, A2, A3
B
Fixed
3
B1, B2, B3
Analysis of Variance
Source
DF
Adj SS
Adj MS
F-Value
P-Value
A
2
11325157
5662578
9.66
0.001
B
2
21976136
10988068
18.75
0.000
A*B
4
1484102
371026
0.63
0.645
Error
18
10548520
586029
Total
26
45333915
Model Summary
S
R-sq
R-sq(adj)
R-sq(pred)
765.525
76.73%
66.39%
47.65%
Comparisons for Data
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: A
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 99% Confidence
A
N
Mean
Grouping
A3
9
3299.33
A
A2
9
2366.44
A
B
A1
9
1721.67
B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Simultaneous Tests for Differences of Means
Difference
of A Levels
Difference
of Means
SE of
Difference
Simultaneous
99% CI
T-Value
Adjusted
P-Value
A2 - A1
645
361
(-555, 1844)
1.79
0.202
A3 - A1
1578
361
(378, 2777)
4.37
0.001
A3 - A2
933
361
(-266, 2132)
2.59
0.047
Individual confidence level = 99.62%
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: B
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 99% Confidence
B
N
Mean
Grouping
B3
9
3490.11
A
B2
9
2603.56
A
B1
9
1293.78
B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Simultaneous Tests for Differences of Means
Difference
of B Levels
Difference
of Means
SE of
Difference
Simultaneous
99% CI
T-Value
Adjusted
P-Value
B2 - B1
1310
361
(110, 2509)
3.63
0.005
B3 - B1
2196
361
(997, 3396)
6.09
0.000
B3 - B2
887
361
(-313, 2086)
2.46
0.060
Individual confidence level = 99.62%
Are the means for Factor A, Level 1 and Factor A, Level 2 significantly different?
A.Yes
Answer: B. No ( p value 0.202 which is > 0.01 level)
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Are the means for Factor A, Level 1 and Factor A, Level 3 significantly different?
Answer: A.Yes ( p value 0.001 which is < 0.01 level)
B. No
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Are the means for Factor A, Level 2 and Factor A, Level 3 significantly different?
A.Yes
Answer: B.No( p value 0.047 which is > 0.01 level)
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor A means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Are the means for Factor B, Level 1 and Factor B, Level 2 significantly different?
Answer A.Yes ( p value 0.005 which is < 0.01 level)
B.No
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Are the means for Factor B, Level 1 and Factor B, Level 3 significantly different?
A.No
Answer B.Yes( p value 0.000 which is < 0.01 level)
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Are the means for Factor B, Level 2 and Factor B, Level 3 significantly different?
Answer:A.No( p value 0.060 which is > 0.01 level)
B.Yes
C.The comparison is unwarranted because there is insufficient evidence to conclude that not all Factor B means are equal.
D.The comparison is unwarranted because Factor A and Factor B interact.
Factor coding
(-1, 0, +1)
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.