Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

In what ways do advertisers in magazines use sexual imagery to appeal to youth?

ID: 3182743 • Letter: I

Question

In what ways do advertisers in magazines use sexual imagery to appeal to youth? One study classified each of 1509 full-page or larger ads as "not sexual" or "sexual," according to the amount and style of the dress of the male or female model in the ad. The ads were also classified according to the target readership of the magazine. Here is the two-way table of counts.

(a) Summarize the data numerically and graphically. (Compute the conditional distribution of model dress for each audience. Round your answers to three decimal places.)


(b) Perform the significance test that compares the model dress for the three categories of magazine readership. Summarize the results of your test and give your conclusion. (Use = 0.01. Round your value for 2 to two decimal places, and round your P-value to four decimal places.)


Conclusion

Reject the null hypothesis. There is not significant evidence of an association between target audience and model dress.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not significant evidence of an association between target audience and model dress.   

Reject the null hypothesis. There is significant evidence of an association between target audience and model dress.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is significant evidence of an association between target audience and model dress.


(c) All of the ads were taken from the March, July, and November issues of six magazines in one year. Discuss this fact from the viewpoint of the validity of the significance test and the interpretation of the results.

This is an SRS. This gives us reason to believe our conclusions might be suspect.

This is an SRS. This gives us no reason to believe our conclusions are suspect.    

This is not an SRS. This gives us no reason to believe our conclusions are suspect.

This is not an SRS. This gives us reason to believe our conclusions might be suspect.

Magazine readership Model dress Women Men General interest Total Not sexual 347 504 247 1098 Sexual 202 93 116 411 Total 549 597 363 1509

Explanation / Answer

Part a   

The conditional distribution of the magazine readership and model dress for each audience is given as below:

Women

Men

General

Total

Not Sexual

347/1509 = 0.230

504/1509 = 0.334

247/1509 = 0.164

0.728

Sexual

202/1509 = 0.134

93/1509 = 0.062

116/1509 = 0.077

0.272

Total

0.364

0.396

0.241

1.000

The bar graph for comparison is given as below:

Part b

Here, we have to perform the chi square test for independence.

Null hypothesis: H0: The variable magazine readership and type of model dress are independent from each other.

Alternative hypothesis: Ha: The variable magazine readership and type of model dress are not independent from each other.

We are given level of significance = alpha = 0.01

The test statistic formula is given as below:

Chi square = [(O – E)^2/E]

The calculations tables are given as below:

Observed Frequencies

Magazine Readership

Model dress

Women

Men

General

Total

Not sexual

347

504

247

1098

Sexual

202

93

116

411

Total

549

597

363

1509

Expected frequencies = Row total * Column total / Grand Total

Expected Frequencies

Magazine Readership

Model dress

Women

Men

General

Total

Not sexual

399.4712

434.3976

264.1312

1098

Sexual

149.5288

162.6024

98.86879

411

Total

549

597

363

1509

Calculations

fo-fe

-52.4712

69.60239

-17.1312

52.47117

-69.6024

17.13121

(fo-fe)^2/fe

6.892172

11.15221

1.111109

18.41266

29.79349

2.968363

Data

Level of Significance

0.05

Number of Rows

2

Number of Columns

3

Degrees of Freedom

2

Results

Critical Value

5.991

Chi-Square Test Statistic

70.33

p-Value

0.000

Reject the null hypothesis

We reject the null hypothesis that the variable magazine readership and type of model dress are independent from each other.

We conclude that the variable magazine readership and type of model dress are not independent from each other.

Reject the null hypothesis. There is significant evidence of an association between target audience and model dress.

Part C

Interpretation:

This is not an SRS. This gives us reason to believe our conclusions might be suspect.

Women

Men

General

Total

Not Sexual

347/1509 = 0.230

504/1509 = 0.334

247/1509 = 0.164

0.728

Sexual

202/1509 = 0.134

93/1509 = 0.062

116/1509 = 0.077

0.272

Total

0.364

0.396

0.241

1.000

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote