Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

6.140 The handshake during employment interviews. Nonverbal cues, such as eye co

ID: 3204503 • Letter: 6

Question

6.140 The handshake during employment interviews. Nonverbal cues, such as eye contact and smiling, have been shown to positively influence the assessment of an interview. Because a firm handshake is often viewed as a sign of confidence and strength, it is thought that it may also influence the assessment. To investigate this, some researchers recruited 98 undergraduate students enrolled in an elective, one-credit career preparation course and had them participate in a mock interview.36 The following table o broken down by gender, summarizes the interviewer's impression of a series of characteristics associated with the interview. These impressions were all rated on a 1-to-5 with 1 representing "weak" and 5 representing "strong." There were 50 females and 48 males in the study. Men Women Characteristic Conscientiousness 3.80 3.88 Extraversion 3.88 3.79 Agreeableness 3.72 3.94. Emotional stability 3.58 3.43 openness to experience 3.50 3.45 Overall handshake 3.70 3.47 Handshake strength 3.64. 3.11 Handshake vigor 3.42 3.25 Handshake grip 3.89 3.51 Handshake duration 3.65 3.50 3.90 3.96 Eye contact

Explanation / Answer

Result:

R code

men <-c(3.80,3.88,3.72,3.58,3.50,3.70,3.64,3.42,3.89,3.65,3.90,4.33)

women <-c(3.88,3.79,3.94,3.43,3.45,3.47,3.11,3.25,3.51,3.50,3.96,4.53)

z <-(men-women)/0.10

z

#Interviewer assessment

z1<- (3.72-3.83)/0.19

z1

R output:

> men <-c(3.80,3.88,3.72,3.58,3.50,3.70,3.64,3.42,3.89,3.65,3.90,4.33)

> women <-c(3.88,3.79,3.94,3.43,3.45,3.47,3.11,3.25,3.51,3.50,3.96,4.53)

> z <-(men-women)/0.10

> z

[1] -0.8 0.9 -2.2 1.5 0.5 2.3 5.3 1.7 3.8 1.5 -0.6 -2.0

> #Interviewer assessment

> z1<- (3.72-3.83)/0.19

> z1

[1] -0.5789474

13 z values are presented in the bold letters.

Critical values for z at 5% level =( -1.96, 1.96)

for Agreeablenss , z=-2.2 which is significant.

for overall handshake , z=2.3 which is significant

for handshake strength , z=5.3 which is significant

for handshake grip , z=3.8 which is significant