As part of a larger study, researchers obtained ratings and nominations on a num

Question

As part of a larger study, researchers obtained ratings and nominations on a number of characteristics for 66 fraternity men from their fellow fraternity members. The following paragraph is taken from their Results section:

Part A:

“...men’s romantic popularity [as measured on a continuous scale with higher numbers indicating more popularity] significantly correlated with several characteristics: best dressed (r = .48), most physically attractive (r = .47), most self-confident (r = .44), best trendsetters (r = .38), funniest (r = .37), most satisfied (r = .32) and most independent (r = .28). Unexpectedly, however, men’s potential for financial success did not significantly correlate with romantic popularity (r = .10).”

1) Define correlation coefficient:

2) Use example above to describe correlation coefficient:

3) Pattern of results:

4) Based on this study is better for fraternity member to possess more of less of these characteristics?

Explanation / Answer

Given the outcome acquired from the connection impacts count (r = .48) and (r = .47), I can tell my companion that the given information are identified with each other and the relationship of mens sentimental fame in light of the best dressed has a huge correlation. On the other hand I can likewise tell my companion upheld with realities from the above information that the relationship between the two factors which is mens monetary accomplishment alongside sentimental fame( r = .10) is NOT a solid positive relationship.

It first implies that crew individuals (instead of whatever remains of society since you just inspected them), see that those details you said were firmly related were more imperative to that society (intimate request) of men, at any rate at the school - expecting it is just a single place, as I am certain 66 brotherhood individuals don't precisely speak to the populace taken all in all - where you directed this review. Though the uncorrelated qualities implies it is less critical. Nonetheless, it doesn't generally imply that they esteem one measurement pretty much. So as to demonstrate that, you would need to demonstrate that these organization men really thought more about sentimental ubiquity as opposed to money related achievement (prevalence). That being said, by the much more grounded quality of the relationship between's sentimental versus money related ubiquity, it would show up as though there was a much more grounded craving by club men at this school to be all the more impractically famous when contrasted with fiscally mainstream. In the event that, by the remote possibility you are requesting that yahoo answers concentrate your test outcomes,

I would 1) Expand your specimen,

2) either take note of a review as a said in An) above, or make your own particular review, and

3) wish you good fortunes in your reviews.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse A
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.