oUtmalNo Spac. Heading1Heading 2 Hea Paragraph Styles WK5 Discussion Consider th

Question

oUtmalNo Spac. Heading1Heading 2 Hea Paragraph Styles WK5 Discussion Consider the scenario: A research paper claims a meaningful contribution to the literature based on finding statistically significant relationships between predictor and response variables. In the footnotes, you see the following statement, "given this research was exploratory in nature, traditional levels of significance to reject the null hypotheses were relaxed to the 10 level." . o By Day 3 Post your response to the scenario in which you critically evaluate this footnote. As a reader/reviewer, what response would you provide to the authors about this footnote?

Explanation / Answer

SOl:

Null hypoothesis:

There is no relationship between predictor and response variables

Alternative hypothesis:

There is a linear relationship between predictor and response variables.

level of signifciance=0.10

Statement says:

Null hypothesis is rejected.
Accept alternative hypothesis

Conclusion:

there is sufficient statistccal evidence at 10% level of significance to conclude that there is significant relationship between predictor and response variable.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse O
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.