28. Mitigation of damages is an obligation in tort law that plaintiffs have to l

Question

28. Mitigation of damages is an obligation in tort law that plaintiffs have to lessen or reduce their potential injuries/damages through prompt medical treatment or other actions a reasonable person would have performed under similar circumstances or injuries. 29. Strict liability is liability without regard to fault 30. In strict liability, a plaintiff must show defendant intended to inflict injury upon plaintiff. 31. There is no difference between a negligence tort and an intentional tort because as to both the law looks to the result to determine the liability of the wrongdoer. 32. In most states, under tort law (especially negligence), people do not have a legal duty to come to the aid or rescue of another human being. 33. With regard to strict liability, there are only two recognized defenses: causation and assumption of risk. Thus, a defendant can claim as a defense that its ultra-hazardous activity was not the cause of the plaintiffs injuries and/or that the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury by voluntarily exposing himself or herself to the abnormally dangerous activity of the defendant or the defendant's business. there is a reasonable means of 34. In a false imprisonment situation, the law states that if escape that would not place a person at risk for injury, then that person is required to m the escape. Failing to do so will not result in the ability to prove false imprisonment ake UR PART LETTER TO THE QUESTION THAT

Explanation / Answer

28. Is mitigation of damages is an obligation in tort law that plaintiff have to lessen or reduce their potential injuries / damages through promt medical treatment or other action a reasonable person would have performed under similar circumstances or injuries ?

True: If the tortfeasor or defendent ready to give immidiate medical treatment to the damages incurred by plaintiff , then the plaintiff has a duty or obligation to mitigate the damages under the tort law.

29. Strict liability is a liability without regard to fault.

True: Under the strict liability in tort law , criminal law the plaintiff need not to prove the defendent's fault , intentions or negligence as the party at fault is bound to accept liability as tort was happened.

30. In a strict Liability, the plaintiff must show defendant intended to inflict injury upon the plaintiff:

False: no, The plaintiff need not to prove the Intention or fault , as the tort was happened and caused the damaged which is against the rules of the government . and hence the defendent is strictly liable for it.

31. True: There is no difference between the intention tort and negligence tort under the strict liability . as the law treates same to both the case because the tort has happened by the defendent or wrongdoer who breakes the law.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse 2
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.