Shared Writing: Ethical and Social Responsibility: Learning Worth 20 Points Cons

Question

Shared Writing: Ethical and Social Responsibility: Learning Worth 20 Points Consider the "Little Albert experiment of Watson and Raynor. Given the ethical standards that now exist and are enforced by review boards, this study is unlikely to be replicated today in exactly the same form. Which ethical standards did the original study appear to violate, if any? How might such a study be modified to avoid ethical problems and protect the participants from both physical and harm? instructor, and you can participate in the class discussion Type here to search

Explanation / Answer

There were a number of ethical issues with the Little Albert experiment and they are in violation of the ethical standards that are in place today.

1. Do no harm: One of the most important ethical principles in research is to not cause any psychological harm. Little Albert was only 9 months old and was constantly frightened each time the white rat was presented.

2. Informed consent: According to most sources, Albert's mother was not informed of that her child was part of the study

3. Right to withdraw from the study: Today, all participants of research studies have the right to withdraw their participation at any point during the experiment. Albert did not have that choice.

4. The professional competence of the researcher: Albert was the only subject in the experiment and there were a number of extraneous variables that may have interfered with the results.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.