What is the central difference between equality retributivism and commensurate d
ID: 3458596 • Letter: W
Question
What is the central difference between equality retributivism and commensurate deserts? Question 3 options: A) One requires that we repay criminals with punishments that are equal to their crimes; the other requires that we repay criminals with punishments that are proportional to their crimes. B) One is endorsed by Stephen Nathanson; while, the other is not. C) One requires that we repay criminals with punishments that are equal to their crimes; the other requires that we reproduce the same suffering that the crime has produced. D) Both are supported by Andrew von Hirsch E) Both are supported by Andrew von Hirsch F) One is a retributivist theory of punishment; the other is not. G) Both are retributivist theories of punishment.
Explanation / Answer
The correct answer is Option A. The central difference between equality retributivism and commensurate deserts is that one requires that we repay criminals with punishment that are equal to their crimes while the other requires that we repay criminals with punishments that are proportional to their crimes.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.