Bll5e T809 (Protected View) Word (Unlicensed Product) ences Mailings Review View

Question

Bll5e T809 (Protected View) Word (Unlicensed Product) ences Mailings Review View Faxit PDF An Invitation to Environmentol Sociology, 5th Edition Bell and Ashwood 8. What is an environmental nonproblem? (p. 277) a. Idealist conceptions of the environment that ignores problems b. Industrial narratives that spin and suppress the evidence of environmenta! problems c. Scientific conflict over environmental problems that arises over disputed evidence d. A lie 9. The book argues that under moral holism, (p. 254) a. environmental problems have emerged because we have tried to pretend that we are distinct from nature. b. people are part of nature. C. "Follow nature" is superfluous advice. d. All of the above. 10. The authors' argument that nature is an inescapably social and political phenomenon rests on the assumption that: (p. 258) a. the ancients show us as much in their teachings. b. nature is in part socially constructed c. scientific conflict over environmental issues arise over contested data. d. politics is a polluting force. 11. What is one example of environmental determinism? (p. 262) a. Huntington's claim that climate was correlated with civilization b. The successful establishment of the Keoladeo Ghana bird sanctuary c. The construction of climate change skepticism d. Suburban and exurban zoning controls

Explanation / Answer

Q-8

Ans: c. scientific conflict over environmental problems that arises over disputed evidence,

Justification:

For example: If we take the statement " Degradable plastic bags don't degrade in landfills..." there is a counter argument for this:

True, but they were never intended to. Degradable plastics were developed in response to the litter, not the landfill, problem. When exposed to sunlight, they will break down into small harmless fragments, eliminating the hazard.

So, this is an environmental nonproblem.

Q-9

Ans: d) all of the above

Description:

Moral holism maintains that what is a moral reason to in one case may not be one in another, and may even be a moral reason not to given suitable circumstances. Some ‘moral particularists’ maintain that moral holism motivates scepticism about the existence of and need for moral principles, along with scepticism about the viability of principle-based approaches to ethics and moral theory.

But I argue that moral holism is itself a form of moral generalism, one that takes facts about the right- and wrong-making powers of (generic) moral factors to explain certain particular moral facts—namely, the rightness and wrongness of particular actions. I also argue that a moral-theoretic version of dispositionalism—the view that dispositions, powers, or capacities are the fundamental units of explanation—explains both why moral holism is true and why moral generalism is true.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse B
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.