The form–content paradigm of psychotherapy allows the therapist to move from the

Question

The form–content paradigm of psychotherapy allows the therapist to move from the ____________orientation of Western approaches to the __________________ orientation which is needed for success with diverse populations.

Question 7 options:

patient-centric, therapy-centric

patient friendly, therapy-centric

therapy-centric, patient-friendly

therapy-centric,patient-centric

Save

Question 8 (1 point)

With regard to obedience research, it is more likely that in countries with ______power distance, rates of obedience will be higher than in countries with ______power distance.

Question 8 options:

Repressed, expressed

Expressed, repressed

High, low

low, high

Save

Question 9 (1 point)

Some studies that people in the United States (individualists) manifested social _________, whereas people in China (collectivists) tended to show social ___________, performing better in pairs than alone.

Question 9 options:

Loafing, striving

Striving, reversing

Striving, loafing

Loafing, strengthening

Save

patient-centric, therapy-centric

patient friendly, therapy-centric

therapy-centric, patient-friendly

therapy-centric,patient-centric

Explanation / Answer

7)answer-d) therapy centric to patient centric approach for cure and diagnosis of diseases in patients.Earlier the approach was limited to the analysis of patient diseases according to the traditional methods of cure and available medicines in market but now the tradition has changed to the analysis of situations and symptoms leading to the development of disease with pathological experimentation and carefull discussion of patient problems.

8)answer-c)High and low, the power distance should be high for obedience between head of organization and employee and if power distance is low , then the rate of obedience will be low due to more understanding and frequent futile discussions leading to destruction of work behavior in an organization.

9)answer--a)Loafing and striving, The people in USA (individualists) mainifested social loafing and people in china(collectivists) tended to show social striving ,tended to perform better in pairs than alone by the studies of Gabrenya in 1985) whereas loafing is an individual characteristic behavior and attribute which is solely dependent upon the independent status of a person by acknowledging and judging the individual strengths of the person during experimantation and analysis of persons.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse T
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.