Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

caSecure |https:/ Isp?content Jd 479766 o Chapter 5 Review Complete Chapter Five

ID: 3505464 • Letter: C

Question

caSecure |https:/ Isp?content Jd 479766 o Chapter 5 Review Complete Chapter Five Review T/F, Classroom Exercise Chapter Five DISCUSSION BOARD DISCUSSION BOARD Medical Group is a fiamily practice clinic owned by St. Mary's Medical Center in Lincoln, Nebraska. It employs five family practice specialists Dorothy, a 3-year-old girl, had spiking high temperatures for about a day and a half. Unable to break her fever, ber mother called the Deering Medical Group and Dr. Lewis, Dorothy's primary care provider, to make an appointment. On learning that the doctor was out of town for several days, Dorothy suggestions. The receptionist told the mother that the symptoms sounded like the flu that was going around and that she give the child Tylenol and fluids and call back in a few days if the child did not get better. After 2 days of persistent high fever, the mother took Dorothy to the emergency room, where the child was diagnosed with meningitis Although heroic efforts were employed, Dorothy died the following day. Using the knowledge that you have gained in the first five chapters, discuss this scenario. What could have been done differently in this situation? If the parents sue, who is liable and why? s mother asked the receptionist if she had any Show All cument 62.pd MacBook Air 2 3 5

Explanation / Answer

In this condition, the patient could have been referred to other specialist or could have atleaset seemed advice of medical assistants. The patient could have gone through diagnostic checkups at assistance level and than could have been given symptomatic treatment properly. The fluid intake caused hyponatremia due to increased ADH of meningitis.

If the parents sue, the Deering medical group as a whole is responsible. It is a case of respondent superior, where the employees is responsible for mistakes of employee. The receptionist should have been properly instructed to avoid any kind of clinical suggestions of her own knowledge to any patient.