.H.?LNormal 11No Spac.\" Headng 1 Heading 2 Title Subtitle Paragraph Styles Whit
ID: 355937 • Letter: #
Question
.H.?LNormal 11No Spac." Headng 1 Heading 2 Title Subtitle Paragraph Styles Whites Only: The KKK and Socially Directed Donation Thomas Simons was assaulted in a $5 robbery in Manatee County Florida. He was struck in the head and sustained massive brain damage that completely. destroed his brain function. His family was approached about donating organs. The family was willing to donate, but with a restriction. Simons was a leader of the Ku Klux Klan Knowing his beliefs, his father agreed to donate "to white recipients only. The organ procurement organization tried unsuccessfully to persuade the family to make an unrestricted donation. The procurement team understood that these organs were in a relatively young man who was healthy before the assault-an ideal source of organs. Those organs could potentially save the lives of several people on the waiting list. A heart, liver, lungs, and pancreas could be procured as well as kidneys. If they were needed, stomach and small intestine coukd also be procured as well as corneas and bone When the family refused to modify the conditions under which the donation would be made, the procurement team, having to make a rapid decision, accepted the restriction and procured the organs. Following these events a national debate occurred Lawyers raised the point that organ procurement in the United States is part of a public system administered by the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network under the supervision of the United Network for Organ Sharing. Should the organs have been accepted under these restrictions? Why or why not? What if the family had placed a restriction that the organs were to go to children first? Would this be acceptable? 1. 2. The conditions which the Simons family pláced are clearly discriminatory. What moralExplanation / Answer
1) The organs should not not have been donated under restrictions. This is because organ donation is a noble charity and it should be donated without any restrictions. It should save the life of the people with utmost priority and should not show any favoritism towards any caste or creed. Even if the family puts a restriction that the organ should go to the children first, should also not be acceptable. Organ donation should be done without any discrimination or favoritism. It should be done on first come first serve basis. As every individual has got equal rights to survive and live.
2) The condition which Simon's family placed is a clear case of Racial Discrimination. People show favoritism towards a particular race and is indifferent towards the other. This leads to unrest amongst the society. Saving somebody's life is a noble charitable task and should be done without any prejudices and discrimination. Being human should be the utmost priority and not any colour, caste,creed, age or gender.
3) According to principle of justice, it is justifiable to put conditions for any gift.But morally and ethically it is not acceptable to put any restrictions and conditions for organ donation. Being human, every individual has got equal rights to survive and live. Thus people should not put any conditions for organ donation.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.