You are a staff associate at a major public accounting firm and graduated from c
ID: 356053 • Letter: Y
Question
You are a staff associate at a major public accounting firm and graduated from college two years ago. You are working on an audit for a small, non-profit religious publishing firm. After performing tests on the royalty payables system, you discover that for the past five years, the royalty payable system has miscalculated the royalties it owes to authors for their publications. The firm owes almost $100,000 in past due royalties. All of the contracts with each author are negotiated differently. However, each author’s royalty percentage will increase at different milestones in books sold (i.e., 2% up to $10,000 and 3% thereafter). The software package did not calculate the increases, and none of the authors ever received their increase in royalty payments. At first you can’t believe that none of the authors ever realized they were owed their money. You double check your calculations and then present your findings to the senior auditor on the job. Much to your surprise, his suggestion is to pass over this finding. He suggests that you sample new additional royalty contracts and document that you expanded your testing and found nothing wrong. The firm’s audit approach is well documented in this area and is firmly based on statistical sampling. Because you had found multiple errors in the small number of royalty contracts tested, the firm’s approach suggested testing 100% of the contracts. This would mean (1) going over the budgeted time/expense estimated to the client; (2) possibly providing a negative audit finding; and (3) confirming that the person who audited the section in the years past may not have performed procedures correctly. Based on the prior year’s work papers, the senior auditor on the job performed the testing phase in all of these years just before his promotion. For some reason, you get the impression that the senior auditor is frustrated with you. The relationship seems strained. He is very intense, constantly checking the staff ’s progress in the hope of coming in even a half-hour under budget for a designated test/audit area. There’s a lot of pressure, and you don’t know what to do. This person is responsible for writing your review for your personnel file and bonus or promotion review. He is a very popular employee who is “on the fast track” to partnership. You don’t know whether to tell the truth and risk a poor performance review and jeopardize your future with this company, or to tell the truth, hopefully be exonerated, and be able to live with yourself by “doing the right thing” and facing consequences with a clean conscience.
1. What would you do as the staff associate in this situation? Why? What are the risks of telling the truth for you? What are the bene?ts? Explain.
2. What is the “right” thing to do in this situation? What is the “smart” thing to do for your job and career? What is the difference, if there is one, between the “right” and “smart” thing to do in this situation? Explain.
3. Explain what you would say to the senior auditor, your boss, in this situation if you decided to tell the truth as you know it
Explanation / Answer
1. What would you do as the staff associate in this situation? Why? What are the risks of telling the truth for you? What are the benefits? Explain.
As a Staff Associate, I would go to Senior Auditor and will report my findings and If he does not listen to me then I will escalate it to higher level. I will bring these disparities to their notice. Because as an employee of the firm, it is my responsibility to inform business if there is any fault in the process. I am accountable to tell my seniors if I notice an anomaly. Customers should be provided the services for which they have paid and Authors should get their royalties which the result of their hardwork.
Following the path of Moral values & Ethics is not always easy. There are risks associated with it. Here the risk of telling truth is that the senior auditor is frustrated over me and wants to cover up the incidence. He is responsible for writing review for my personnel file and bonus or promotion review so he can write a bad review or since he is a very popular employee, he can also fire me
Benefits of this may be correction of the mistakes happening in business process after fixing the software package if the Higher level of management listen to me. I may get a reward and can get recognized for my honesty nad truthfullness.
2. What is the “right” thing to do in this situation? What is the “smart” thing to do for your job and career? What is the difference, if there is one, between the “right” and “smart” thing to do in this situation? Explain.
The right thing to do here is to tell the truth to your Supervisor. The smart thing to jo for job and career is to wait for the performance review to get over and then tell the Supervisor. The one difference here is for "choosing the right time to tell the truth with approriate data"
3. Explain what you would say to the senior auditor, your boss, in this situation if you decided to tell the truth as you know it
I will tell him that our firm owes almost $100,000 in past due royalties. The royalty payable system has miscalculated the royalties it owes to authors for their publications as software package did not calculate the increases. None of the authors ever received their increase in royalty payments.
I will tell him that this is such a serious mistake of our system which can harm our firm's reputation in future so we should inform all the necessary stakeholders and fix it as soon as possible.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.