Examine the circumstances that resulted in the merger or acquisition for a compa

Question

Examine the circumstances that resulted in the merger or acquisition for a company you have selected. Submit answers to the following in 2-3 pages. Name and briefly describe the company you are investigating, including the company culture. Suggest two (2) reasons why the resulting decision to merge or to acquire / be acquired was made. Analyze the positive and/or negative effects of the merger or acquisition. Provide at least two (2) examples of those effects now that the merger or acquisition has been completed. Describe the organizational structure that resulted from the merger or acquisition. Was there a change in type of structure? Was leadership and the executive team retained or replaced? How did the merger or acquisition deal with two groups of employees? How might the company environment have changed? Analyze the major differences between the resulting company and the original two (2) organizations. Outline the differences and similarities in a table.

Explanation / Answer

In 2005 ,Procter and gamble purchased Gillette. This is specific purchases parked and internal growth which lead yet to be more innovative in the specific Market by introducing and merging itself into Procter and gamble.
Procter and gamble use the top talent included in the Gillette. It was hard to maintain employees into the organisation as a Gillette merged into Procter and gamble.
Procter and gamble handled the situation by hiding the top 10 and from June 18 to the organisation and also increasing that payments. By properly training the top employment from July, procter and gamble successfully developed a better marketing strategy by using these top talents and tackle the challenges by training the employees effectively according to the market. They found 100 login integration teams which specifically must both of the organisations into a single unit. They are also allowed to use their own processes in some specific countries such as China to increase the level of productivity while retaining the prophets.
Procter and gamble slowly merged all the applications from Gillette into the organisation which also increase the level of impact in processes which affected the change in the organisational structure of both of the companies. Procter and gamble successfully to and step to increase the communication and carefully crafted all the internal and external communication which reflect the merging rather than acquisition.
Procter and gamble successfully launched the cultural differentiation between both of the companies and improve the overall situation by merging the employee satisfaction as well. Smooth transition. Procter and gamble to shutdown gillette's offices and to integrate themselves into procter and gamble. They also integrated internal stakeholders in the decision making processes which made this specific merging lot easier for the delayed employees.
Procter and gamble also didn't remove ethical practices being practiced in each and every country and place regarding gene its culture. The adopted the culture from Gillette and implemented it into a positive way to Procter and gamble.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse E
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.