“There is an argumentthat emotions are necessary for thought and as computer can
ID: 3616717 • Letter: #
Question
“There is an argumentthat emotions are necessary for thought and as computer cannot haveemotions, therefore it is difficult to build a computer thatthinks. But on the other hand, with the advent of new technologyespecially quantum computers, scientists believe that cognitiveresearch will boost up and they will be able to develop ways forcomputers to learn emotions. Do you think machines with emotionswill be beneficial for humans or it will be destructive? Supportyour answer with explanation of at least one of its applicationarea.”Explanation / Answer
Emotion. By Ronald de Sousa. Entry in the StanfordEncyclopedia of Philosophy. "several philosophers and computerscientists have sustained to be concerned in integrating computingtheory with emotions. Aaron Sloman has elaborated the sort of ideasthat were embryonic in Shank and Colby into a more sophisticatedcomputational theory of the mind in which emotions are virtualmachines, playing a crucial part in a intricate hierarchicarchitecture in which they control, monitor, schedule andoccasionally disrupt other control modules. (Wright, Sloman &Beaudoin 1996). Rosalind Picard (1997) lays out the evidence forthe view that computers will need emotions to be truly intelligent,and in particular to cooperate intelligently with humans. She alsoadverts to the role of emotions in evaluation and the pruning ofsearch spaces. But she is as to a great extent or more fretful toprovide an emotional theory of computation than to intricate acomputational theory of emotions. Lastly, a forthcoming book byMarvin Minsky bears the promising title of The emotionmachine."
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.