4 Insurance Contract. Richard Vanderbrook\'s home in New Orleans, Louisiana, was
ID: 376175 • Letter: 4
Question
4 Insurance Contract. Richard Vanderbrook's home in New Orleans, Louisiana, was insured through Unitrin Preferred Insurance Co. His policy excluded coverage for, among other things lood, surface water, waves, tidal water, overflow of a body of water, or spray from any of these whether or not driven by wind." The policy did not define the term flood. In August 2005 Hurricane Katrina struck along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, devastating portions of Louisiana. In New Orleans, some of the most significant damage occurred when the levees along three canals-the 17th Street Canal, the Industrial Canal, and the London Avenue Canal-ruptured, and water submerged about 80 percent of the city, including Vanderbrook's home. He fi led a claim for the loss, but Unitrin refused to pay. Vanderbrook and others whose policies contained similar exclusions asked a federal district court to order their insurers to pay. They contended that their losses were due to the negligent design, construction, and maintenance of the levees and that the policies did not clearly exclude coverage for an inundation of water induced by negligence. On what does a decision in this case hinge? What reasoning supports a ruling in the plaintiffs' favor? In the defendants' favor?[In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation, 495 F.3d 191 (5th Cir. 2007)]Explanation / Answer
The case is about the insurance contract of Richard Vanderbrook’s home in New Orleans, Louisiana which was done by the Unitrin preferred insurance company. His policy was excluded the coverage from flood and may other items too. So, based on the policy the decision should be in favour of defendants. As the policy do not have the coverage of the flood or the hurricane so, they are not liable to pay the insurance amount as per the contract. The decision in this case hinge in part of the defender. But it is the liability of the Insurer that they should have clearly mention the clause in the contract so that another party may not have the confutions.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.