you are to consider what it would mean for an expression in EAC-CPF to be correc
ID: 3814610 • Letter: Y
Question
you are to consider what it would mean for an expression in EAC-CPF to be correct, and to what extent a denotation-based semantics like the one presented in the Bach chapters would be useful in formalizing the meaning of EAC-CPF. Answer the following questions in precise English (with each answer 1-2 paragraphs long). Upload your assignment here.
Consider the <level> element nested within the <structureOrGenealogy> element. Would it make sense for a <level> to denote a truth value? What other kinds of things besides a truth value could be the referent of a <level> in this language?
Bach's PC semantics illustrates Frege's principle of compositionality, which states that the meaning of a language expression is based on the meaning of its constituents. For example, the meaning of a disjunction in PC is based on the meaning of each disjunct, and the meaning of an atom is based on the meanings of the predicate and terms. In EAC-CPF, how would you recommend that the meaning of a <level> element be determined by the meanings of the elements nested within it?
How does the truth of a level element depend on the meaning of notation like m., 2m., and d.? Can we use a denotative semantics to account for their meanings? If not, please explain why that won't work, and if we can, then propose one or more categories of entity that those abbreviations could denote.
Does the semantics of predicate logic give us any help in accounting for the meaning of EAC-CPF? Try expressing three facts from this genealogy in predicate logic.
a emacs DESKTOP-F8CR2MJ File Edit options Buffers Tools xML Text Help Save language Used K language languageCode "eng" English /language script scriptCode Latn Latin script languageUsed Xstructure0r Genealogy outline level item Sir John Boswell of Bal gregy (d. 1429) m. Margaret Jardyn Vitem level item David Boswell of Balmuto m. Elizabeth Malvil of Raith item level item 2m Isobel Wemyss K item level K item David Boswell of Glasmount m 1464 Grizel Wemyss /item level item Sir Alexander Boswell of Balmu to (d 1513) m. Elizabeth Ramsay item K level level K item 2m Alison Sandilands item level item children item level level level item Euphemia Boswell m 1485 Alexander Meldrum item level level item Isobel Boswell m 1489? Thomas Lundy] item level level K item Gelys Boswell m 1493 William Balram item level level level K item 2m 1480 Margaret Sinclair item level K item William Boswell of Lochgellie item level level 15 154 nXML Valid) yale Boswell Family.xmlExplanation / Answer
The first work described above was extremely useful as a feasibility study and an effective work tool for archivists, but it could not be used to open the authority records codified with this standard to the world of Linked Open Data. It was necessary to transform the elements of the schema into properties of the ontology and to change the point of view of the description of the model. It was necessary to move from the description of the XSD schema in RDF to the definition of a new model based on the schema (thus maintaining the names of the elements and the attributes). This new data model keep the main division of the xml schema between the control area and the description area, where control "contains information about identity, creation, maintenance, status, and the rules and authorities used in the composition of the description.", while description "contains the name or names by which the identity is known, and optionally may contain historical context description to facilitate understanding of the identity. The >cpfDescription< includes a required >identity< element containing authorized or parallel name entries and optional >description< and >relations< to provide contextual information for the entity being described, including the relation of the entities to other entities, resources, and functions."
During the elaboration of the ontology we have assumed some general rules:
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.