Cambridge Company was a general contractor hired by Borden, LLC to design and bu

Question

Cambridge Company was a general contractor hired by Borden, LLC to design and build an oilseed processing plant. Cambridge contracted with Jordan Corp. to supply critical seed processing equipment for the project. Jordan's proposal to get the contract specifically identified the Borden project and the proposal included a diagram of the planned Borden plant. Jordan won the contract but did a terrible job and the project was a failure. Borden sues Jordan under the Jordan-Cambridge contract. What is Borden's argument? What is Jordan's argument? Who wins? 4.

Explanation / Answer

Though in this case Cabridge Company has direct contract with Jordan but the task is to supply the equipment to Bordean who has direct contract with Cambride. Bordean's arguement can be being the originator of contract it can sue Jordan for doing terrible job and ultimately failure of the project.It is the legal duty of Jordan to implement the project with proper way and successfully completing the project.Jordan's argument is not strong in this case because it has delivered a failed equipment and the project is failed in this case.Under the  Contract Disputes Act, Bordean will win the case.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.