select a WSJ article that reports on an ethical dilemma related to the week’s te
ID: 389217 • Letter: S
Question
select a WSJ article that reports on an ethical dilemma related to the week’s textbook chapter (below mentioned, at the end ) Read the article and post your personal reaction to the article. You are being asked to form a moral or ethical judgment of the ramifications and implications of the ethical dilemma that you have identified in the WSJ article.The approximate length of a discussion forum response should be about 200 words, 20 lines; Succinctly summarize the article that you have selected; Present the ethical dilemma that you have identified in the article as a QUESTION; Select and apply any one of the many ethical theories which are covered in the course (e.g., consequentialism, deontology, virtue ethics, etc.) to carry out your ethical analysis; Form an OBJECTIVE moral or ethical judgment of the ramifications and implications of the ethical dilemma that you have identified in the WSJ article; https://www.wsj.com/ -the chapter in the book is about these points -importance of an ethics screen 6 steps 1. Ethics screen notice 2. Legal ground rules 3. Behavioral information 4. Personality traits and related characteristics 5. Interview questions 6. Pos interview test select a WSJ article that reports on an ethical dilemma related to the week’s textbook chapter (below mentioned, at the end ) Read the article and post your personal reaction to the article. You are being asked to form a moral or ethical judgment of the ramifications and implications of the ethical dilemma that you have identified in the WSJ article.
The approximate length of a discussion forum response should be about 200 words, 20 lines; Succinctly summarize the article that you have selected; Present the ethical dilemma that you have identified in the article as a QUESTION; Select and apply any one of the many ethical theories which are covered in the course (e.g., consequentialism, deontology, virtue ethics, etc.) to carry out your ethical analysis; Form an OBJECTIVE moral or ethical judgment of the ramifications and implications of the ethical dilemma that you have identified in the WSJ article; https://www.wsj.com/ -the chapter in the book is about these points -importance of an ethics screen 6 steps 1. Ethics screen notice 2. Legal ground rules 3. Behavioral information 4. Personality traits and related characteristics 5. Interview questions 6. Pos interview test select a WSJ article that reports on an ethical dilemma related to the week’s textbook chapter (below mentioned, at the end ) Read the article and post your personal reaction to the article. You are being asked to form a moral or ethical judgment of the ramifications and implications of the ethical dilemma that you have identified in the WSJ article.
The approximate length of a discussion forum response should be about 200 words, 20 lines; Succinctly summarize the article that you have selected; Present the ethical dilemma that you have identified in the article as a QUESTION; Select and apply any one of the many ethical theories which are covered in the course (e.g., consequentialism, deontology, virtue ethics, etc.) to carry out your ethical analysis; Form an OBJECTIVE moral or ethical judgment of the ramifications and implications of the ethical dilemma that you have identified in the WSJ article; https://www.wsj.com/ -the chapter in the book is about these points -importance of an ethics screen 6 steps 1. Ethics screen notice 2. Legal ground rules 3. Behavioral information 4. Personality traits and related characteristics 5. Interview questions 6. Pos interview test
Explanation / Answer
The Ethical Dilemmas of Driverless Cars-Jul 16,2013 WSJ
with the introduction of self-driving car arises the challenge of new ethical dilemmas. There exist many ethical dilemmas like whom should the vehicle save and whom should it harm and when an accident is unavoidable.
There are situations which even rational beings like humans can't avoid. In such scenarios, the car should decide for itself who to save and whom to harm in unavoidable situations. The driverless cars as per research s by Mckinsey & Company aims to reduce accidents by up to 90%. The chances of accidents are eliminated entirely may remain a dream. How do children, elderly people and other factors change the equation?
The real ethical dilemma which exists in the minds of the people regarding the driverless car era is "what would the driverless car do in a situation where child jumps in front of the car suddenly and there exists no time to break. what will happen them? Will the car steer onto the oncoming traffic injuring the driver and the passengers or steer into the sidewalks possibly killing pedestrians? or continuing straight and hitting the child" This question remained unanswered for many years until the Germans implemented the utilitarian theory. it states that the self-driving car should always try to minimize human death and there exist no discrimination against individuals on the basis of age, gender or any other factors. Human Lives are the same and should be given equal priority. The utilitarian theory does not neglect the value of the life of people on the basis of their actual or future considerations. Utilitarian tries to minimize the damage caused. If a driverless car was to be utilitarian, the car would try to minimize the number of deaths that resulting in the minimum damage. Hence in the example above the car will try to minimize the damage by not steering into a group of pedestrians and not steering into oncoming traffic and thus may result in hitting the child where the damage is least or if we assume the child is absent the passenger will result in being injured. This makes it tougher, even though people who agree on utilitarian theory to implemented they will never travel in a driverless vehicle as it may always end up in the passenger being injured. The people need the driverless cars to be self-protective (i.e protect the passenger at all costs) and to be utilitarian.
Ethical judgement
whether the driverless car is programmed with an ethical system that all people agree it is rather very important the car performs the task which it is already programmed to do perfectly. The system has to rationalize and decide on a way which maximises the safety of the life of people. As per research 90% of the car accidents are due to human error and driverless cars eliminate human error and it is 90% safer leads to a consensus regarding the implementation of the driverless cars. Considering cars driven by Human and which are driverless, the driverless car promises to minimize the damages caused to the people. Hence implementation of Driverless car Is the best compared to Human Drivers.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.