Referring to the PGA tour case on page 383 of the text, responding to the follow

Question

Referring to the PGA tour case on page 383 of the text, responding to the following questions.

Case Questions. 1. Why was the PGA so reluctant to allow Martin to use the golf cart, especialy considering carts are allowed in other tournaments? Do you agree with the Court's reasoning that allows Martin to use a cart during tournaments does not give him an advantage? Why or why not? Are there any scenarios in which it might and, as a result, would alter the fundamental nature of the game? 3. Given the court's reasoning , would a request to double the size of the hole so a partically blind competitor could see it when putting fundamentally alter the game. Explain your answer.

The name of the book is Legal Environment of Business and its by Me Katz, M. (2015).The Legal Environment of Business: A Managerial Approach : Theory to Practice/Edititon 2 . I have read but I am a little confused still please help its due friday

Explanation / Answer

1. The pga visit contended that the manage on strolling was a basic piece of the session of golf. the imperial and ancient golf association thought about the establishing affiliation and overseeing body of the game of golf long remained by that courses ought to be of strolling source as it were. actually, in Scotland where golf was conceived the vast majority of the connections courses are as yet strolling courses right up 'til the present time.

2. I do concur with the courts decision to permit martin the utilization of a golf truck in competition play. I feel that martin showed a genuine inability that ought to enable accommodation keeping in mind the end goal to make things reasonable for him. the visit focused on an esteem they set as fundamental piece of the amusement in as the weariness from strolling assumed an essential job. I would demand that martin confront a more prominent weariness because of his condition and in this way was off guard to whatever remains of the competition members. the court did not however take the additional fatigue of martin as a state of the control exemption. instead they center around the way that the recompense could be made under the Americans with incapacities act that the utilization of a truck does not change the quintessence of golf.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse R
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.