Taylor hired Jack to cut all the lumber off of Taylor’s mountainside property. T

Question

Taylor hired Jack to cut all the lumber off of Taylor’s mountainside property. This contract was orally stated and provided that Jack must complete the work within two years from the contract’s date. Which one of the following statements is most correct?

a. This contract is unenforceable since it must be in writing.

b. This contract is enforceable since Jack could possibly perform his obligation within one year although that is improbable.

c. This contract is unenforceable since Jack probably cannot complete the work within one year.

d. This contract is enforceable even though the statute of frauds is applicable.

Explanation / Answer

The most suitable of above the options listed is option D. The contract is enforceable even though the statute of frauds is applicable because, the contract comes under an express contract, where the contract can be oral or written but all the elements are previously discussed and if possible a written agreement is signed upon. But for these lumbering services, an oral contract is sufficient with stringent measures and beforehand discussions.

I tried to explain in short and crisp way, do let me know if you have doubts on the explanation mentioned above

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse T
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.