rel 212 w10 How does the View of Good & Evil relate to all of the religions cove
ID: 396590 • Letter: R
Question
rel 212 w10 How does the View of Good & Evil relate to all of the religions covered and to your own social or work experiences.
**Religions Covered Hinduism & Jainism, Buddhism, Taoism & Confucianism, Shinto, Judaism, Christinaty, Islam, Sikhism, New Religious Movement
Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: Select ONE (1) category ***(View of Good & Evil)*** from the completed World View Chart.
Provide a rationale for choosing this category. What is compelling about this category? Why is it important in the study of religion? Describe the selected content and explain the significance of the selected category across all of the religions studied. Show in what ways the category is significant for each religion. Give an example of how you have noticed this category in your life, town or country. What impact does this category have in the everyday lives of people who practice religion in your area? (You do not have to give examples of all the religions in your area, just one you have noticed besides any you practice). For example, in Cincinnati, Ohio we have Hindu, Greek Orthodox, Catholic festivals in the summer. So if my category were "Festivals and Celebrations" I could use those events as my example. Please comment email so that i can send world chart for reference
Explanation / Answer
Worldview is an all-encompassing framework which may be a philosophy, fundamental themes, values, emotions, and ethics that are commonly accepted by human beings across the world. It enables them to accept or reject certain acts of human beings that fall into or do not respectively and thus forms a uniform code for the society to act in a certain manner to avoid unnecessary conflicts and misunderstanding.
Biblical or Christian world view is the way of life that is based on the teachings and preaching of Bible. If a person considers teachings of Bible as the standard to be followed in life and he tends to decide what to do or say according to them, then he is apparently following Biblical worldview. God selected to let those rules oversee God's creation, moderately than God requiring altering the course of those heavenly laws.
Accordingly, wonders do not occur and God is "Wholly Other", comprehensive superior from mortality, with unconditionally no nearness among persons. One conceivable logical importance of deism is that since God doesn't have to be complicated in humanoid businesses, then we actually don't essential God at all. Disbelief can quickly be acceptable from a technical, logical and even intelligently religious viewpoint.
Another offshoot of modernization is fundamentalism, which first increased importance in the early 20th century. On the outward, while deism and fundamentalism seem to be conflicting excesses, they portion many conventions.Most apparent is the ethical and psychic potentials originate within humanity that reflects the personality of God.
The foundations of Christian theology are expressed in ecumenical creeds. These professions of faith state that Jesus grieved, expired, were suppressed, and were resuscitated from the dead in order to grant everlasting life to those who have faith in in him and faith in him for the reduction of their immoralities.
The faiths further uphold that Jesus physically rose into paradise, where he reigns with God the Father. Most Christian coinages teach that Jesus will return to judge everybody, living and dead, and to grant eternal life to his supporters. He is reflected the model of a righteous life. His ministry, execution, and renaissance are often mentioned to as the "gospel", meaning "good news”.
Biblical View influences me when I try resolving ethical dilemmas which I confront in my personal or professional life. I try to define my moral values according to the basics elucidated in Bible.
This leads me support and feeling that I am doing the right thing. I do not follow practical ethical values in resolving ethical dilemmas because they are mostly derived from convenience and ease of application rather than following the right path. Bible influences me to a great extent for knowing between the right and wrong and also between the two rights and thus I always arrive at a best possible solution.
The modern mind is apprehensive principally with Truth. The wish to systematically pronounce and explicate eventual genuineness and phenomenological realism has directed the growth of the contemporary worldview. Not only are these actualities describable, but they are, for all applied devotions, for the contemporary, one in the identical with their phenomenology and talented to be designated in comparable ways by all people. For the current in regards to Christianity, many historical elements have industrial from this worldview. One of the most influential of the 19th Century elements was deism. This side-shoot of tolerance hypothetical that God formed the universe in the Establishment, beginning all of the commandments of environment at that period and then permitting those commandments take their sequence. Within this view, God selected to let those rules oversee God's creation, moderately than God requiring altering the course of those heavenly laws. Accordingly, wonders do not occur and God is "Wholly Other", comprehensive superior from mortality, with unconditionally no nearness among persons. One conceivable logical importance of deism is that since God doesn't have to be complicated in humanoid businesses, then we actually don't essential God at all. Disbelief can quickly be acceptable from a technical, logical and even intelligently religious viewpoint. Another offshoot of modernization is fundamentalism, which first increased importance in the early 20th century. On the outward, while deism and fundamentalism seem to be conflicting excesses, they portion many conventions. The fundamentalists were divided into two camps. One campground supposed that Scripture could be confirmed by way of discipline. The more generous of the two camps, they industrialized complicated sequence of apologetics to demonstration that a verbatim clarification of scripture could be authenticated in the physical record, by ecology, by stargazing, etc. While often widening the reliability of their rights to technical capability, they completed countless labours to join science with Scripture, with the belief that the religious laws documented in Scripture were someway touched with and partly elucidated by the usual laws recognized in the construction of the cosmos. This view of Truth is exclusively modern. The supposition is that there is one Truth that is obtainable to all in the same system. From an observed position, the opinion says that final realism is flawlessly describable and all learning will look the equivalent to all people. From a mystical perspective, the opinion says that God is eventual truth. When one looks for God one will see Truth and that Truth is accessible to all who seek God with trust, love, desire and honesty. However, this disregards numerous progresses in thinking, as well as some ostensible realities of social being. First, dissimilar philosophies have always recognized dissimilar standards of certainty. For example, while science would seem to be worldwide, the supposition that science itself is the foundation for authenticity is a supposition based on futuristic principles. Science has come to be significant for Western civilization and has fetched us astonishing chances and welfares.
It can be seen that religion though forming one of the essential theories of societies is different in its approach to evolution and is different from other sociological theories which contribute to evolution of man and society .the origins of religion are so orthodox that proving its origin has made and created wars and resulted in heavy debates.
The sociological approach to religion essentially remained distinctive because of the way religion has contributed to the influences in society. It has had profound impacts on human development and history and the way it has shaped the human thought process and cohesed social forces, makes religion one of the strongest contenders in evolving societal practices. (Hamilton 1994). A
The sociology of religion therefore is inextricably related to the way religion remains an undisputed force in society and hence this intrinsic nature of religion makes it different from other studies.
It differs from other normative study in the sense that there is no clear definition of religion and it cannot be subject to hard core rules of practice. It is something which people follow because they have been indoctrinated into it or feel a faith in pursuing it. There are no scientific practioners or no theories which establish its identity. (Émile Durkheim .1917)
"Religion celebrates, and thereby, reinforces, the fact that people can form societies" (Beckford 1989:25). The concept of religion is so evolving and faith so subtly embedded in its practices that societies were defined by religion and not by other normative studies .( What then will happen when time-honored forms of society begin to mutate so rapidly that. The theoretical definition of religion makes its inevitable because it performs a very necessary function.
References
Hinnells, The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion, p. 441
Calvin, John. "Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book Three, Ch. 25".
Religion in the Roman Empire, Wiley-Blackwell, by James B. Rives, page 196
Aquinas, Thomas, (2000) God and human freedom, In Philosophy of Religion: A Guide and Anthology, edited by Brian Davies, 625-627. New York: Oxford University Press.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.