In a networked government system, third-party providers are entrusted with subst

Question

In a networked government system, third-party providers are entrusted with substantial public assets, and it is the responsibility of the executive branch to assure that private actors are held accountable for discharging state action appropriately. For example, when the mayor of Indianapolis, privatized half of the trash routes in the city. They immediately notified citizens that the mayor retained responsibility for trash pickup and directed them to contact the city call center to complain if there were problems -- regardless of whether a city employee was assigned to that route. So, what procedures should the executive branch consider in order to protect democratic values in a system of networked government? Be sure to explain and support your response. Responses should be no less than three paragraphs. Hint, there are three main components to this question.

Explanation / Answer

In a Networked Government System, selected, persistent and structured set of autonomous firms are engaged in creating products or services based on implicit and open-ended contracts adapting to environmental contingencies and co-ordinating and safeguarding exchanges. These contracts are socially binding and not legally binding. In this system, some non-gevernment organisation or private party is entrusted to perform or take over the work that may be beneficial for the society as a whole. Here, the executive branch of the government should ensure the work is done according to the constitution and the private party should not behave in a manner as a self government. Therefore, to protect the democratic values in a system of networked government, the executive branch must follow some procedures as discussed below:

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.