Given technology today, would it be more feasible than in the past for the Unite
ID: 421559 • Letter: G
Question
Given technology today, would it be more feasible than in the past for the United States to become more of a direct democracy than a republic? What would be the benefits? The drawbacks? What did we learn from Athenian democracy, the Enlightenment, and our founders that would argue against making democracy more direct?Complete the main post in paragraph form, with at least one APA formatted reference, and citing of the reference. The main post requires a minimum of 300 words Given technology today, would it be more feasible than in the past for the United States to become more of a direct democracy than a republic? What would be the benefits? The drawbacks? What did we learn from Athenian democracy, the Enlightenment, and our founders that would argue against making democracy more direct?
Complete the main post in paragraph form, with at least one APA formatted reference, and citing of the reference. The main post requires a minimum of 300 words Given technology today, would it be more feasible than in the past for the United States to become more of a direct democracy than a republic? What would be the benefits? The drawbacks? What did we learn from Athenian democracy, the Enlightenment, and our founders that would argue against making democracy more direct?
Complete the main post in paragraph form, with at least one APA formatted reference, and citing of the reference. The main post requires a minimum of 300 words
Explanation / Answer
The US being a republic, not a democracy is a false dichotomy. It is a political order in which power lies in the representatives. In the Government by the people, democracy is exercised through the elected representatives. In a direct democracy, laws & decisions are made by a majority Government. The government may be aristocratical, monarchical, or, democratical. The United States is a constitutional democracy. Courts can restrain the democratic will. The US Government is the Constitutional Federal representative democracy. One can ask for a shift towards a direct democracy, but it can make governing difficult in case of a coalition. Also, passing laws is difficult in case of a rule of a large number of small parties.
Natural rights, and, social contract are attributed to Enlightment. In the 4th century, Athens can be interpreted as a social contract. In a direct democracy, citizens choose alternatives that maximize an individual's welfare. A set of strategies are chosen, and, a political framework changes on the basis of these strategies. A political system thus resembles a mathematical model. Democracies try to look for an optimal rate of change.
The benchmark for an optimal rate of political change is the neoclassical theory. Athens was an advanced system of direct democracy. Citizens could introduce proposals in front of the decision-making body. The Athenian direct democracy achieved a balance between volatility, and, stability. The model of choice in a direct democracy shows the possibility of Pareto improving solutions when compensatory payments are allowed.
Direct Democracy & Social Contract in Ancient Athens (Kyriazis, Economou, Zachilas), International Journal of Humanities, and, Social Sciences (2012)
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.