Case Scenario: On April 12, 1993, Mehmet Bahadirli sought employment as a pizza

Question

Case Scenario: On April 12, 1993, Mehmet Bahadirli sought employment as a pizza delivery person at the Westgate Parkway store, a Domino's pizza franchise in Dothan, Alabama. According to the plaintiff, he visiting the store and was told that he was well qualified for the position, but he never received work regarding the job. The plaintiff alleges that on his return to the store around April 25, 1993, he was told that he would not be hired for the position. According to the plaintiff, in the interim four other individuals were hired at the Westgate Parkway store. According to Clarkfinn, plaintiff was told that the application had been misfiled and that the Westgate Parkway store did not have any openings. Bahadirli contends that on learning he would not be hired, he went directly him and asked his wife to call the shop and inquire about employment. Plaintiff alleges his wife was offered a position over the phone. Clarkfinn is the corporate entity that owns the Domino's Pizza franchise at issue here. Mr. Clark owns 75% of Clarkfinn's stock and serves as the corporation's president. The issue is whether the franchisor or the franchisee is ultimately responsible for the discriminatory acts. Instructions Prepare a case brief of the above case scenario. Identify the issue, rule(s), analysis, and conclusion. Please use the headings in your case brief write-up as shown below Issue: The issue should be a one-sentence statement that identifies what the problem the key players (HR managers or a court) may need to decide. Rule: The rule should be identified based on the readings. A rule of law will apply to the case scenario facts. Please identify the correct rule that should apply and cite the rule. Analysis: This section shows that you can apply the rule to the facts of the case to resolve the issue. Conclusion: Properly conclude how the case should be resolved

Explanation / Answer

Solution for this Case:

Issue :

Mehmet Bahadirli - Westgate Parkway Store, Alabama

National Origin Discrimination: Not Enlisted Attributable to National beginning Rule :

• Title VII of the common Right Act of 1964, upheld &administered by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

• The Federal Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.

• New York, and California additionally restrict this kind of work segregation.

Examination :

Title VII of the social equality Act of 1964 restricts segregation with regards to the compensation, terminating, contracting, advancements, work assignments, preparing, cutbacks, incidental advantages, and, different terms of business They can likewise not be dealt with unjustifiably inferable from their affiliation or marriage to a man of a specific root.

                    Mehmet Bahadirli went to the store on 12-04-1993, and,25-04-1993: he was told he was all around qualified yet was later not offered work.

                      He was informed that there were no openings at the store while he trusts four people were employed in the meantime.

                     He got some information about work at the store: she was told she can be contracted by the store.

Conclusion :

Mehmet Bahadirli was being oppressed The firm should take after a hostile to separation approach, and, should pay a specific pay as chose by the court to settle the segregation suit.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.