Bryan Janz was just arriving back from lunch when his office phone rang. It was

Question

Bryan Janz was just arriving back from lunch when his office phone rang. It was his wife, Nina, calling from home. Nina told Bryan that FedEx had just delivered a package addressed to her. The package contained a beautiful clock now sitting over the fireplace. In fact, Nina said, “the clock looks absolutely beautiful on our living room fireplace”. Thinking the clock was from a family member, Bryan asked who sent the present. She said she did not recognize the name—the clock was from Mr. James McEnroe. Bryan immediately told Nina that she had to repack the clock because it was from a supplier who has been trying to win business from Bryan’s company. They definitely could not accept the clock. Nina was very upset, and responded that the clock was perfect for the room and, besides, the clock came to their home, not to Bryan’s office. Because of Nina’s attachment to the clock, Bryan was unsure about what to do.

Assignment Questions
   1.   What should Bryan do about the clock?
   2.   What does the Institute of Supply Management (formerly the NAPM) code of ethics say about accepting supplier favors and gifts?
   3.   Why do you think the supplier sent the clock to Bryan’s home and addressed it to his wife?
   4.   Does the mere act of sending the clock to Bryan mean that Mr. McEnroe is an unethical salesperson?

Explanation / Answer

1. his first thought is the right thought, he need to revert it. it may send to his residential home, not in the form of money, but it is a crime and if he accepts it, he will be legally punishable. so, it has to be revert it to the sender immideately.

2. no kind of gifts or grants or any kind of ammusements should accept from any suppler, all these or any of these are treated as bribe and they will be leagally answerable and punishable

3. if it sent to work area, all others known that Bryan accepts his gift and it may leads to actions against Bryan by his boss. it shold not be know to all, so he sent it to his home with his wife's name.

4. yes, he should be presumed that he is an unethical supplier. if he is correct in his act, and in his work, definitely the contract is going to be assign him only. beyond he may carry some kind of loopholes in his work and to cover the gap he offered bribe to the purchase manager.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse B
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.