Clyde Monett has been operating an art restoration business since 1998, speciali

Question

Clyde Monett has been operating an art restoration business since 1998, specializing in the refurbishment of portraits and paintings. He operated the enterprise as a sole proprietorship (called Monett’s Art Restoration Services) until 2006, when he attended a “Business Structures, Licenses and Permits” workshop at the local community college, at which time the presenting attorney suggested he convert his business to a corporation, in order to “shield” Monett’s personal property and real estate from liability for his business’ financial obligations (Monett’s personal net worth is approximately $150,000.) Through the incorporation process, the only change to the business name was the addition of the word “Incorporated.” Monett was the only incorporator of the business. He serves as the president, vice-president and treasurer of the corporation; his sister, Georgette O’Keeffe, is the secretary. Since the corporation was formed in 2006, Clyde and Georgette have only convened one “official” corporate meeting; the meeting lasted approximately one hour, and the two shared family gossip for forty-five minutes of that hour. Monett’s Art Restoration Services, Incorporated has maintained an average daily balance of $45.22 in the corporate checking account at Homeland National Bank. Yesterday, Monett inadvertently purchased the wrong art refurbishment materials (the cleaning solution was too acidic,) and the oversight resulted in irreparable damage to a painting conservatively valued at $75,000. The owner of the painting, Paul Picasso, demands $75,000 in damages from Monett; Monett apologizes, offers two free coupons for future restoration services, and refuses to pay the $75,000. The current corporate checking account balance is $52.84. Is Clyde Monett personally liable for the $75,000 damage claim? Is he ethically obligated to pay Paul $75,000?

Explanation / Answer

Answer: A corporation doesn’t protect its owner towards a personal or direct loss/injury incurred by customers and here Clyde Monett unconscious act has resulted into Paul Picasso personal loss worth $75000 which the corporation is not laible to pay. Therefore this is the personal liability and ethical obligation of Clyde Monett to pay to Paus for his loss.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.