What (toes oversight refer to in a legislative context? Is it partisan in nature

Question

What (toes oversight refer to in a legislative context? Is it partisan in nature or not? Use an example. What two Issues, historically, have been key issues dealt with by presidents? What problems exist for a president in the implementation of those issues. What makes budget decisions more difficult for Governors than for the Federal government? Does the Supreme Court deal more with public or private law cases? Why? What kinds of cases are handled almost exclusively by the Supreme Court? What significant limitation do courts have in the creation of policy? What federal government official works closely with the Supreme Court to identify cases involving government that they should hear? Do partisan politics play a role in the Supreme Court? Discuss. Describe the kind of litigants who are successful at the "litigation game". Why? What factors may work against the implementation of judicial policies? Describe three. Using transportation as an example, describe different concepts in the role of government.

Explanation / Answer

1. Oversight in legislative context refers to the extent to which the legislatures can monitor the application and effect of the laws it has enacted. Hence Oversight deals largely with the review and the control measures for any policies introduced at that time. Yes oversight is partisan in nature because the people in charge of the government will be forced to agree by the words of the party or the leaders ruling them. Partisan is a word that is used to refer an adherent supporter of a person or a group who shoes biased emotional allegiance. For example when the ruling party introduces a bill in the parliament the supporters of the party would blindly support the bill instead of analyzing the pros and cons. Partisan politics is evident in almost all the political decisions.

2. Historically the two main issues that the Presidents deal are the unemployment and the inflation. These two factors are directly related with the consumption of the society and hence will affect the GDP. In order to overcome these issues, President will have to either increase the interest rates or alter the level of open market operations.

3. The governors find it more difficult to handle budget decisions than the Federal Government since the actions of the Federal Government will be aligned with the entire nation, where as the Governor will be concerned about their State legislation. There are difference in the laws pertaining to the central and the state government. The State government is given power and autonomy to manage the state as the Federal Government will be more concerned with Macroeconomic management. The micro management is done by the governors hence the Governors are finding it more difficult to handle budget decisions.

4. Supreme court deals with more of public cases than the private cases since being the Supreme or the final legal authority of a country the court will not be able to concentrate on petite private issues, It will have to concentrate on public issues that pose a threat to the entire economy. The state has equal powers to handle private cases and the type of case is determined by the nature of compliant and the complaining party. Further the parties area of jurisdiction also plays a major role in determining the type of court that the party will have to approach for. Supreme court thus deals with more of public cases than the private cases.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse W
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.