SOS!!! Under the legal theory of gift law, there must be consideration and a leg
ID: 469967 • Letter: S
Question
SOS!!!
Under the legal theory of gift law, there must be consideration and a legally enforceable contract. there does not need to be consideration. gifts can be for real and personal property. b and c none of these. Look over the article titled "Alaska town promises land with a view-free." Which legal issue best applies to this article The 1.3 acre lots are a bailment. The 1.3 acre lots are a constructive bailment. The 1.3 acre lots are a conditional gift. The 1.3 acre lots are abandoned property. The 1.3 acre lots are only an easement. The statement in "LET IT OUT, " which states "To the person in Kentucky who stole my Uncle's IU flag and post: We're electrify the next one." If a person comes on the Uncle's property without permission and tries to steal the flag and post, but instead is electrocuted, what are the legal issues? invitee and there is liability for the electrocution. licensee and there is liability of the electrocution trespasser and there is liability for the electrocution. trespasser and there is no liability for the electrocution. invitee and there is no liability for the electrocution.Explanation / Answer
15.Correct answer is option d i.e b and c.Gift is a voluntary transfer of property from one person to another person which must be made without any expectation of receiving any compensation in return.Gifts can be for real and personal property.Real property refers to land or any immovable property attached to land.Personal property is the property except from land.
16. Correct answer is option c i.e the 1.3 acre lots are a conditional gift.Because the land distributed is for free and there is no expectation for any consideration in return.But it is given with a condition that the winning applicant must build a house measuring at least 1000 square feet within two years.Thus,it can be considered as a conditional gift
17.Correct answer is option d i.e trespasser and there is no liability for the electrocution.becausethe person entered the property without the permission of the property owner and the property owners posted the sign that warn of danger and still the trespasser came to steal the flag.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.