Complete the \"Analytics Exercise: An MRP Explosion – Brunswick Motors," Com
ID: 470014 • Letter: C
Question
Complete the "Analytics Exercise: An MRP Explosion – Brunswick Motors,"
Complete the Analytics Exercise: : An MRP Explosion – Brunswick Motors,; at the end of Chapter 21 in the textbook. Answer Questions 1-3. Put in an excel document.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
Analytics Exercise: An MRP Explosion—Brunswick Motors Recently, Phil Harris, the production control manager at Brunswick, read an article on time-phased requirements planning. He was curious about how this technique might work in scheduling Brunswick’s engine assembly operations and decided to prepare an example to illustrate the use of time-phased requirements planning. Phil’s first step was to prepare a master schedule for one of the engine types produced by Brunswick: the Model 1000 engine. This schedule indicates the number of units of the Model 1000 engine to be assembled each week during the last 12 weeks and is shown below. Next, Phil decided to simplify his requirements planning example by considering only two of the many components that are needed to complete the assembly of the Model 1000 engine. These two components, the gear box and the input shaft, are shown in the product structure diagram below. Phil noted that the gear box is assembled by the Subassembly Department and subsequently is sent to the main engine assembly line. The input shaft is one of several component parts manufactured by Brunswick that are needed to produce a gear box sub assembly. Thus, levels 0, 1, and 2 are included in the product structure diagram to indicate the three manufacturing stages that are involved in producing an engine: the Engine Assembly Department, the Subassembly Department, and the Machine Shop. The manufacturing lead times required to produce the gear box and input shaft components are also indicated in the product structure diagram. Note that two weeks are required to produce a batch of gear boxes and that all the gear boxes must be delivered to the assembly line parts stockroom before Monday morning of the week in which they are to be used. Likewise, it takes three weeks to produce a lot of input shafts, and all the shafts that are needed for the production of gear boxes in a given week must be delivered to the Sub assembly Department stockroom before Monday morning of that week. In preparing the MRP example Phil planned to use the worksheets shown on the next page and to make the following assumptions:
1. Seventeen gear boxes are on hand at the beginning of Week 1, and five gear boxes are currently on order to be delivered at the start of Week 2.
2. Forty input shafts are on hand at the start of Week 1, and 22 are scheduled for delivery at the beginning of Week 2.
Questions:
1.) Initially, assume that Phil wants to minimize his inventory requirements. Assume that each order will be only for what is required for a single period. Using the following forms, calculate the net requirements and planned order releases for the gear boxes and input shafts. Assume that lot sizing is done using lot-for- lot (L4L).
2.) Phil would like to consider the costs that his accountants are currently using for inventory carrying and setup for the gear boxes and input shafts. These costs are as follows:
Part Cost
Gear Box Setup 5 $90/order
Inventory carrying cost 5 $2/unit/week
Input Shaft Setup 5 $45/order
Inventory carrying cost 5 $1/unit/week
Model 1000 master schedule
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Demand 15 5 7 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Model 1000 product structure
Engine assembly
Gear box
Crankcase Lead time = 2 weeks
Used: 1 per engine
Input shaft
Lead time = 3 weeks
Used: 2 per gear box
Given the cost structure, evaluate the cost of the schedule from question 1. Assume inventory is valued at the end of each week.
3.) Find a better schedule by reducing the number of orders and carrying some inventory. What are the savings with this new schedule?
Engine assembly master schedule
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Quantity
Gear box requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements
Scheduled receipts
Projected available balance
Net requirements
Planned order release
Input shaft requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements
Scheduled receipts
Projected available balance
Net requirements
Planned order release
This is what I have so far, not sure if it’s correct:
Gear box requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements 15 5 7 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Scheduled receipts 5 5 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Projected available balance 2 2
Net requirements 5 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Planned order release 5 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Input shaft requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements 10 20 30 40 20 16 4 32
Scheduled receipts 22 38 20 16 4 32
Projected available balance 30 32 32 2
Net requirements 38 20 16 4 32
Planned order release 38 20 16 4 32
Complete the "Analytics Exercise: An MRP Explosion – Brunswick Motors,"
Complete the Analytics Exercise: : An MRP Explosion – Brunswick Motors,; at the end of Chapter 21 in the textbook. Answer Questions 1-3. Put in an excel document.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
Analytics Exercise: An MRP Explosion—Brunswick Motors Recently, Phil Harris, the production control manager at Brunswick, read an article on time-phased requirements planning. He was curious about how this technique might work in scheduling Brunswick’s engine assembly operations and decided to prepare an example to illustrate the use of time-phased requirements planning. Phil’s first step was to prepare a master schedule for one of the engine types produced by Brunswick: the Model 1000 engine. This schedule indicates the number of units of the Model 1000 engine to be assembled each week during the last 12 weeks and is shown below. Next, Phil decided to simplify his requirements planning example by considering only two of the many components that are needed to complete the assembly of the Model 1000 engine. These two components, the gear box and the input shaft, are shown in the product structure diagram below. Phil noted that the gear box is assembled by the Subassembly Department and subsequently is sent to the main engine assembly line. The input shaft is one of several component parts manufactured by Brunswick that are needed to produce a gear box sub assembly. Thus, levels 0, 1, and 2 are included in the product structure diagram to indicate the three manufacturing stages that are involved in producing an engine: the Engine Assembly Department, the Subassembly Department, and the Machine Shop. The manufacturing lead times required to produce the gear box and input shaft components are also indicated in the product structure diagram. Note that two weeks are required to produce a batch of gear boxes and that all the gear boxes must be delivered to the assembly line parts stockroom before Monday morning of the week in which they are to be used. Likewise, it takes three weeks to produce a lot of input shafts, and all the shafts that are needed for the production of gear boxes in a given week must be delivered to the Sub assembly Department stockroom before Monday morning of that week. In preparing the MRP example Phil planned to use the worksheets shown on the next page and to make the following assumptions:
1. Seventeen gear boxes are on hand at the beginning of Week 1, and five gear boxes are currently on order to be delivered at the start of Week 2.
2. Forty input shafts are on hand at the start of Week 1, and 22 are scheduled for delivery at the beginning of Week 2.
Questions:
1.) Initially, assume that Phil wants to minimize his inventory requirements. Assume that each order will be only for what is required for a single period. Using the following forms, calculate the net requirements and planned order releases for the gear boxes and input shafts. Assume that lot sizing is done using lot-for- lot (L4L).
2.) Phil would like to consider the costs that his accountants are currently using for inventory carrying and setup for the gear boxes and input shafts. These costs are as follows:
Part Cost
Gear Box Setup 5 $90/order
Inventory carrying cost 5 $2/unit/week
Input Shaft Setup 5 $45/order
Inventory carrying cost 5 $1/unit/week
Model 1000 master schedule
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Demand 15 5 7 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Model 1000 product structure
Engine assembly
Gear box
Crankcase Lead time = 2 weeks
Used: 1 per engine
Input shaft
Lead time = 3 weeks
Used: 2 per gear box
Given the cost structure, evaluate the cost of the schedule from question 1. Assume inventory is valued at the end of each week.
3.) Find a better schedule by reducing the number of orders and carrying some inventory. What are the savings with this new schedule?
Engine assembly master schedule
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Quantity
Gear box requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements
Scheduled receipts
Projected available balance
Net requirements
Planned order release
Input shaft requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements
Scheduled receipts
Projected available balance
Net requirements
Planned order release
This is what I have so far, not sure if it’s correct:
Gear box requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements 15 5 7 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Scheduled receipts 5 5 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Projected available balance 2 2
Net requirements 5 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Planned order release 5 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Input shaft requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements 10 20 30 40 20 16 4 32
Scheduled receipts 22 38 20 16 4 32
Projected available balance 30 32 32 2
Net requirements 38 20 16 4 32
Planned order release 38 20 16 4 32
Complete the "Analytics Exercise: An MRP Explosion – Brunswick Motors,"
Complete the Analytics Exercise: : An MRP Explosion – Brunswick Motors,; at the end of Chapter 21 in the textbook. Answer Questions 1-3. Put in an excel document.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
Analytics Exercise: An MRP Explosion—Brunswick Motors Recently, Phil Harris, the production control manager at Brunswick, read an article on time-phased requirements planning. He was curious about how this technique might work in scheduling Brunswick’s engine assembly operations and decided to prepare an example to illustrate the use of time-phased requirements planning. Phil’s first step was to prepare a master schedule for one of the engine types produced by Brunswick: the Model 1000 engine. This schedule indicates the number of units of the Model 1000 engine to be assembled each week during the last 12 weeks and is shown below. Next, Phil decided to simplify his requirements planning example by considering only two of the many components that are needed to complete the assembly of the Model 1000 engine. These two components, the gear box and the input shaft, are shown in the product structure diagram below. Phil noted that the gear box is assembled by the Subassembly Department and subsequently is sent to the main engine assembly line. The input shaft is one of several component parts manufactured by Brunswick that are needed to produce a gear box sub assembly. Thus, levels 0, 1, and 2 are included in the product structure diagram to indicate the three manufacturing stages that are involved in producing an engine: the Engine Assembly Department, the Subassembly Department, and the Machine Shop. The manufacturing lead times required to produce the gear box and input shaft components are also indicated in the product structure diagram. Note that two weeks are required to produce a batch of gear boxes and that all the gear boxes must be delivered to the assembly line parts stockroom before Monday morning of the week in which they are to be used. Likewise, it takes three weeks to produce a lot of input shafts, and all the shafts that are needed for the production of gear boxes in a given week must be delivered to the Sub assembly Department stockroom before Monday morning of that week. In preparing the MRP example Phil planned to use the worksheets shown on the next page and to make the following assumptions:
1. Seventeen gear boxes are on hand at the beginning of Week 1, and five gear boxes are currently on order to be delivered at the start of Week 2.
2. Forty input shafts are on hand at the start of Week 1, and 22 are scheduled for delivery at the beginning of Week 2.
Questions:
1.) Initially, assume that Phil wants to minimize his inventory requirements. Assume that each order will be only for what is required for a single period. Using the following forms, calculate the net requirements and planned order releases for the gear boxes and input shafts. Assume that lot sizing is done using lot-for- lot (L4L).
2.) Phil would like to consider the costs that his accountants are currently using for inventory carrying and setup for the gear boxes and input shafts. These costs are as follows:
Part Cost
Gear Box Setup 5 $90/order
Inventory carrying cost 5 $2/unit/week
Input Shaft Setup 5 $45/order
Inventory carrying cost 5 $1/unit/week
Model 1000 master schedule
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Demand 15 5 7 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Model 1000 product structure
Engine assembly
Gear box
Crankcase Lead time = 2 weeks
Used: 1 per engine
Input shaft
Lead time = 3 weeks
Used: 2 per gear box
Given the cost structure, evaluate the cost of the schedule from question 1. Assume inventory is valued at the end of each week.
3.) Find a better schedule by reducing the number of orders and carrying some inventory. What are the savings with this new schedule?
Engine assembly master schedule
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Quantity
Gear box requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements
Scheduled receipts
Projected available balance
Net requirements
Planned order release
Input shaft requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements
Scheduled receipts
Projected available balance
Net requirements
Planned order release
This is what I have so far, not sure if it’s correct:
Gear box requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements 15 5 7 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Scheduled receipts 5 5 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Projected available balance 2 2
Net requirements 5 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Planned order release 5 10 15 20 10 8 2 16
Input shaft requirements
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements 10 20 30 40 20 16 4 32
Scheduled receipts 22 38 20 16 4 32
Projected available balance 30 32 32 2
Net requirements 38 20 16 4 32
Planned order release 38 20 16 4 32
Explanation / Answer
Q1.
Week
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Engine
15
5
7
10
0
15
20
10
0
8
2
16
Item: GB
OH = 17
LT = 2
SS = 0
Q =L4L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Gross Req.
15
5
7
10
0
15
20
10
0
8
2
16
Scheduled receipts
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Projected-on-hand
17
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Net Requirement
0
0
5
10
0
15
20
10
0
8
2
16
Planned order Receipts
0
0
5
10
0
15
20
10
0
8
2
16
Planned order releases
5
10
15
20
10
8
2
16
Item: Shaft
OH = 40
LT = 3
SS = 0
Q =L4L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Gross Req.
10
20
0
30
40
20
0
16
4
32
0
0
Scheduled receipts
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Projected-on-hand
40
30
32
32
2
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
Net Requirement
0
0
0
0
38
20
0
16
4
32
0
0
Planned order Receipts
0
0
0
0
38
20
0
16
4
32
0
0
Planned order releases
38
20
16
4
32
Q2
Cost for Gear Box:
Total Carrying Cost = $2 x (2 + 2) = $8
Total Ordering Cost = $90 x 8 = $720
Total Cost for GB = $8 + $720 = $728
Cost for Shaft:
Total Carrying Cost = $1 x (30 + 32 +32 + 2 + 20) = $232
Total Ordering Cost = $45 x 5 = $225
Total Cost for GB = $232 + $225 = $457
Total Planning cost for Engine = $728 + $457 = $1185
Q3.
Apply least total cost method for lot sizing:
Aggregate requirements of the subsequent periods and order them in first period such that cost change from first period to next is least.
Weeks
Quantity Ordered
Carrying Cost
Ordering Cost
Total Cost
Cost change
1
0
2
0
3
5
0
1 x 90 = 90
90
0
3 to 4
5+10 = 15
10 x 2 = 20
1 x 90 = 90
110
20
3 to 5
5+10+0 = 15
(10+0) x 2=20
1 x 90 = 90
110
0
1 st order
3 to 6
5+10+0+15 = 30
(15+5+5) x 2 = 50
1 x 90 = 90
140
30
Order 15 units in week 3 to cover demand of Wk#3, 4, and 5
6
15
0
1x90 = 90
90
0
6 to 7
15+20=35
20x2=40
1x90 = 90
130
40
6 to 8
15+20+10=45
(30+10)x2 = 80
1x90 = 90
170
40
6 to 9
15+20+10+0=45
(30+10+0)x2 = 80
90
170
0
2nd order
6 to 10
15+20+10+0+8=53
(38+18+8+8)x 2 = 144
90
234
64
Order 45 units in week 6 to cover demand of Wk# 6, 7, and 8
Weeks
Quantity Ordered
Carryig Cost
Ordering Cost
Total Cost
10
8
0
1x90 = 90
90
0
10 to 11
8+2=10
2x2=4
1x90 = 90
94
4
11 to 12
8+2+16=26
(18+16)x2 = 68
1x90 = 90
158
64
Order 26 units in week 10 to cover demand of Wk# 10, 11, and 12
Week
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Engine
15
5
7
10
0
15
20
10
0
8
2
16
Item: GB
OH = 17
LT = 2
SS = 0
Q =least cost
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Gross Req.
15
5
7
10
0
15
20
10
0
8
2
16
Scheduled receipts
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Projected-on-hand
17
2
2
10
0
0
30
10
0
0
18
16
Net Requirement
0
0
5
0
0
15
0
0
0
8
0
0
Planned order Receipts
0
0
15
0
0
45
26
0
0
Planned order releases
15
45
26
Item: Shaft
OH = 40
LT = 3
SS = 0
Q =L4L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Gross Req.
30
0
0
90
0
0
0
52
0
0
0
0
Scheduled receipts
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Projected-on-hand
40
10
32
32
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Net Requirement
0
0
0
58
0
0
0
52
0
0
0
0
Planned order Receipts
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
52
0
0
0
0
Planned order releases
58
52
Cost for Gear Box:
Total Carrying Cost = $2 x (2 + 2+10+30+10+18+16) = $176
Total Ordering Cost = $90 x 3 = $270
Total Cost for GB = $8 + $720 = $446
Cost for Shaft:
Total Carrying Cost = $1 x (10 + 32 +32) = $74
Total Ordering Cost = $45 x 2 = $90
Total Cost for GB = $232 + $225 = $164
Total Planning cost for Engine = $728 + $457 = $610
Week
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Engine
15
5
7
10
0
15
20
10
0
8
2
16
Item: GB
OH = 17
LT = 2
SS = 0
Q =L4L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Gross Req.
15
5
7
10
0
15
20
10
0
8
2
16
Scheduled receipts
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Projected-on-hand
17
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Net Requirement
0
0
5
10
0
15
20
10
0
8
2
16
Planned order Receipts
0
0
5
10
0
15
20
10
0
8
2
16
Planned order releases
5
10
15
20
10
8
2
16
Item: Shaft
OH = 40
LT = 3
SS = 0
Q =L4L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Gross Req.
10
20
0
30
40
20
0
16
4
32
0
0
Scheduled receipts
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Projected-on-hand
40
30
32
32
2
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
Net Requirement
0
0
0
0
38
20
0
16
4
32
0
0
Planned order Receipts
0
0
0
0
38
20
0
16
4
32
0
0
Planned order releases
38
20
16
4
32
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.