Public health interventions must balance the rights and concerns of individuals

Question

Public health interventions must balance the rights and concerns of individuals with the needs and safety of society. For example, should the government require vaccinations to prevent disease outbreaks? Does the government have the authority to enforce such health behaviors? Why or Why not? In other words, whose rights should prevail the rights of the individual to freedom or the rights of the public to stay safe and healthy? How would you balance the rights of individual and society? Show Support for your Response

Explanation / Answer

Bioethics committees have issued guidelines that medical interventions should be permissible only in cases of clinically verifiable disease, deformity, or injury. Furthermore, once the existence of one or more of these requirements has been proven, the proposed therapeutic procedure must reasonably be expected to result in a net benefit to the patient.

To avoid problems in adolescents health unit plan prophylactic treatment like immunisations for adults like prophylactic mastectomy, immunisations, cosmetic ear surgery, and circumcision.

The benefits of the intervention accrue primarily to the general society rather than to the individual, who is left with the burden of the harms generated by the intervention.

To prevent diseases yes healthy volunteers can be participate in the trial if the trial is approved to administer the dose is safe on healthy human beings after the testing is over on the animals.

Bioethics and human rights are both predicated upon the desire to protect individual freedoms, promote justice, prohibit exploitation, and ensure human dignity. So we should recruit people on their own interest after disclosing the whole information and take the inform consent form as a proof for their willingness.

Clinically verifiable disease, deformity, or injury are present or are highly likely to be present in the future. The proposed intervention must be the least invasive and most conservative treatment option. Children are uniquely vulnerable due to inability to provide informed consent. The issue of informed consent relative to the care of children has recently generated much discussion among ethicists. Prophylactic medical interventions are frequently performed on healthy individuals who have given informed consent. Provided certain stringent requirements are satisfied, they may also be performed without consent on incompetent minors.

The burden to the individual's human rights and health must be balanced against and found to be substantially outweighed by the benefit to society in helping prevent a highly contagious disease or other potentially calamitous condition from affecting the public health.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse P
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.