\'11 AT&T; 10:42 PM ocean.instructure.com Case Three: Existentialist Ethics Anal
ID: 130073 • Letter: #
Question
'11 AT&T; 10:42 PM ocean.instructure.com Case Three: Existentialist Ethics Analyze the following case from the ethical perspective of Existentialist ethics. What questions need to be asked from this perspective? What is the basic point of view that you will use to approach this case? Finally, what ethical judgment should be made about this case, from the perspective of Existentialist ethics? OCEAN Account CD Case: You are driving down the highway around 8:00 in the evening when you see a car about 75 yards in front of you swerve out of control and hit a telephone pole. When you come to the car you see three people inside. Only one is moving and he is weakly saying, "Please help me. I can't get out No one else is around, but the traffic on this highway is such that another car should pass by this spot in one minute or so. You are very nervous because the engine is still running and you think you smell gasoline. You are afraid that the car might blow up like they do in the movies. Also, you have heard about people trying to help in situations like this who wind up having to go to court several times to testify for insurance purposes, and sometimes being sued because even though they were trying to help when they did something which further injured the victims. Ethically speaking, what should you do? Courses Calendar 21 Inbox Help Case Four: The Ethics of Care Analyze the following case from the ethical perspective of an ethics of care. What questions need to be asked from this perspective? What is the basic point of view that you will use to approach this case? Finally, what ethical judgment should be made about this case, from the perspective of Existentialist ethics? Case: A lesbian couple, Alice 23 and Jennifer 28, are seeking the right to enter a legal marriage. At this point in time, the state does not allow homosexual and lesblan couples to do this. They claim that they are being unfairly discriminated against by the state and that the law prohibiting their marriage should be struck down. Both have passed the required blood tests and physical exams Alice has a net worth of $400,000 that she inherited from her aunt (her mother's sister). Once she turned twenty-one, she gained full control over this money. If she becomes a partner within a legal marriage, than that person would inherit this money, as well as all other property if Alice were to die Moreover, Alice is presently two months pregnant as a result of artificial insemination. If Alice dies, then her partner, Jennifer, would gain sole custody of this child Alice's mother is completely overwrought at the prospect of this marriage. She claims that it is a perverse relationship that should not be legitimized by the state. The mother is worried about issues of inheritance, grandchilldren, and what happens in the case of divorce. What attitude should society take toward this marriage? Should the laws prohibiting their marriage be overturned?Explanation / Answer
1. As a normal human being following the laws of the universe and humanity, I should save atleast the third one who is moving. It's a crash, so I'm not very sure whether I should do it on my own or get the paramedics and call the police. I would certainly call the police and ambulance as part of my ethical choice. Because if So it on my own I might hurt the person further. I also have a confusion that if the third person dies before the paramedics or the police arrive, I'll have a life long struggle reasoning my choice. But I'll make sure that I am safe and not affected in any way.
2. Everyone in this world has got their right to live as they wish as long as they are adults. This means, without hurting anyone intentionally. Just because someone will inherit Alice's money and the child after her death doesn't mean she should suffer while she lives. It's her body, her money and her choice to live as a lesbian. Why should others be bothered even. Her mother is worried materialistically and the state by preventing her to choose her life denies her basic rights for existentialism. So both her mother and the state should approve their indepency and rights.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.