What information is presented and why is it significant? What\'s the argument wi
ID: 295653 • Letter: W
Question
What information is presented and why is it significant? What's the argument within the field of geology and are both perspectives being equally portrayed in the education system? Why or why not?
What is uniformitarianism? Give evidence, if any, for the support of this view.
What is catastrophism? Give evidence, if any, for the support of this view.
Can both really be true?
What are the implications of this question and why does it matter?
Has there been any suppression in the public-policy or scientific community regarding any one of these views as it relates to geology, climatology or any other sciences and why might this be so?
Please include specific examples from the attached articles in your paper as well as any outside information you would like to add (acceptable but not necessary).
Historical Background: Catastrophism versus Uniformitarianism As a nroduction, we first need to take a historical step back several bundrvd years in ingland. In the 1700s through the 1800s many British og were also clergymen. They did not see any conflict between geoloy and their Christian faith. They accepted a literal reading of the ble and lnelieved that G-d created everything in six days and that some line later Hle brought a worldwide deluge which, they suggested, subse- quentily determined the geology of the Earth. As an example, in 1698 Dr. ohn Wodward wrote a book entitled An Essay toward a Natural History of the rth...with an Account of the Universal Delugeand of the Effects that It Had upon the Earth. This was followed by Relics of the Flood, the major work of xford professor of geology William Buckland (1784-1856). To quote from ni ol Professor Buckland's lectures, "...we find such undeniable proofs a nicely balanced adaptation of means to ends, of wise foresight and be nevisle.nl intention and infinite power, that he must be blind indeed, who r-luses lo recognise in them proofs of the most exalted attributes of the C'realur:"* Brause in the 1820s its geologists used religion as the founda- lion nl their sienc, this decade at Oxford is called the "diluvial decade." lhven b-lre Bcklad wrote his book, rcactions against his ad Wxod wards vi‘.w:-were bring voiced. The most prominent eritil. w. 1.mws of a beginning, no prospecterl. Hn», lullon vhrly pul ortli lhe notion of a very old Earth. A5 we. "hall 2stw, ?1Mt.".I'Jml. Ihe dominant paradigm for geology and even lor biokgyI l geology lexthook:. Hutton is referred to as the father of modern geology The early geologists who advocated a universal flood to explain h geology of the Earth were called "catastrophists." Their view was tht violent, catastrophic events in the past determined the geology of the Earth. Catastrophists were viewed as scientists who invoked supernatural causes, and catastrophic thinking was closely linked, in many people's,Explanation / Answer
1.there is discuss the catastrophism and uniformitarianism process of the geology. both are most important process or terminology of the geology if we want to understand the history of the earth. uniformitarianism is the process which refers that which process or natural agents are working today would be working in the past not necessarily with the same intensity but their way of working would be the same and will same in the future only intensity can be varied. on other hands, catastrophism process refers that all change on earth crust due to sudden violent events which having no pre-indication and it changes earth crust completely in a few minutes. both are important to understanding various events of geology. otherwise, we cant define various events like today's process of natural agent and extinction of the dinosaur etc,
2. uniformitarianism refers that which process works today, all were working in past time also not necessarily with the same intensity but way of working would be the same. we can see many features on earth surface which are continuously eroded by the natural agents we have many sites which are plane today but its lithology tells us that there was a huge mountain on that place but due to natural agents now it becomes plain.
3. catastrophism refers that earth crust changed by the sudden events in earth history, not by the continuous process of natural agents. it said that natural agents are not enough able to change earth surface drastically. examples of the catastrophism are the theory of the extinction of dinosaur due to the impact of a celestial object to the earth surface.
4.although both are process contradictory but its there a possibility that both processes were working together and natural agents were working with their intensity and catastrophic events take their place in between.
5. these questions help us to understand the history of the earth orderly and it will help us too to understand the current scenario and process of the earth which are going on.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.